[okie01]

So your saying a legitimate President is the same thing as a usurper?

The Constitution provides only one way to remove a sitting President: impeachment.

Accordingly, if a court were to determine that he is ineligible for the office, the only recourse would be impeachment.

Recall, however, that a Democrat Senate refused to find Bill Clinton guilty of (blatent) perjury and (obvious) obsgruction of justice.

It would not surprise me if, should Obama be found to have born in Borneo, that a Democrat Senate would not judge that peachy keen.

[Carling]

The common theme is that everybody in this thread agrees that Obomba has yet to produce a long-form BC, or any proof of citizenship. What disappoints me is how many of the most energetic posters on this issue, such as rxsid, seem obviously ignorant of who to actually remove Obomba from office. Then, when given the answers, instead of accepting them and focusing on those avenues, they would rather bicker with fellow FReepers, who agree with their motives, but are giving them suggestions for the correct methods.

It's this ignorance that diminishes the BC movement, IMO. Obomba is not going to resign, a radio host isn't going to accomplish anything, and Congress is the most realistic, as well as only procedural, approach to removing him from office, outside of defeating him in 2012.