Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tips up
How can you prove a negative? Burden is on him to prove that he is constitutionally eligible

Pelosi vouched for Obomba, which made him eligible. Court cases challenging constitutionality have been thrown out, regardless of the motivation of the judges.

I guess I don't see where this is going, without unimpeachable proof showing that Obomba is a liar and a fraud. Even with that, the Dems and the media won't recognize it as proof. I'm not happy that we have such an unknown as President, but that's the position we are in as of 11:43am PDT, 4/7/11.

135 posted on 04/07/2011 11:51:29 AM PDT by Carling (Obama: Inexperienced and incompetent, yet ego maniacal. God help us all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]


To: Carling
I guess I don't see where this is going

I'm sorry, but I just don't understand this kind of thinking. Where it's going is not the point. If it ends in Obama's resignation, in nothing at all, or at some point in between, it doesn't matter. You don't gauge whether you're going to do what's right based on your chances of success.


148 posted on 04/07/2011 11:59:57 AM PDT by Cinnamontea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson