Could well be. But somehow I can't give the FL minister a pass either. His actions were intended to be provacative....and they succeeded. Maybe the UN staff would've been killed over something else....maybe not.
The minister's response to the murders is careful to not even mention his actions. Does he not defend them because they are...indefensible?
Talk about throwing gasoline on a fire..
I don't care how much of a ass the Florida pastor is. The loons in Afghanistan killed a bunch of people who have nothing to do with him and probably wouldn't support him. This had nothing to do with the pastor in Florida. The responsibility is solely 100% theirs.
Please tell me how you know the intent was to be provocative rather than reciprocal and/or protest?
At the risk of being flamed here...I say that Rev. Scott has a lot of blood on his hands. He knew he would provoke a response. It’s like punching someone and not expecting to get punched back. Rev. Scott how did this bring glory to the Kingdom of G-d?