This is stupid. Judges cannot order legislators not to enact laws.
Indeed. Judges are to derive conclusion from an original set of legislations to reconcile. They are not supposed to be the originators or suers of such originations but subserviant to their existence or at the most recommand legislations for reconciliations.
However they are not the legislators and executives who should send for execution of said legislations by fiat threat of civil war. These would be a coup d’etat or threats meriting removal.
I just spotted a citation in an online copy of the state constitution to the effect that the court cannot invalidate a law for any reason except that it violates the constitution. Did Sumi find a constitutional violation?