IOW, I post a link to those who have verified the COLB, which you already know of, you attack the source as part of the conspiracy, attack the document as a fraud. See, I don’t really want to play this game. Why? It’s bs, that’s why. If the document is fake, that means Obama is guilty of forgery. One would think that the state of Hawaii would not look to kindly on that, unless everyone of any significance, including the republican former governor, is part of the conspiracy as well.
Hawaii have their heads stuck where the sun doesn't shine. Lying on the Internet is not against the law. You're a fool. In the words of Roberta Gibbs, Obama's former mouth piece,
"Because for $15, you can get an Internet address and say whatever you want."
Which also goes for Obama's alleged COLB that Gibbs said he put on the Internet.
IOWs you have nothing and are just bloviating like BOR. Those who have proof aren’t afraid to show it.
Dude, you cannot verify a document from a picture of a document. You can only do so with the document itself.
Be that as it may, where Obama was born is irrelevant. His father was British, and born under the British Nationality Act of 1948 by his own admission. Being born under the jurisdiction of two nations means you can be Natural Born of neither.
Obama was not, never could have been, and never will be a Natural Born Citizen of the United States. Citizen, most likely. an Hawaiian COLB says he is most likely a citizen. However, Natural Born... utterly impossible.
The COLB is not dubious. It has been verified by reputable sources...
I think I can help you here 'Gip.
This is the seal of the Royal Society, the oldest continuously operating scientific society. Note the motto.
The Royal Society's motto 'Nullius in verba' roughly translates as 'take nobody's word for it'. It is an expression of the determination of Fellows to withstand the domination of authority and to verify all statements by an appeal to facts determined by experiment.
This motto derives from Horace's Epistles, the quote: Nullius addictus judicare in verba magestri which means "Not compelled to swear to any master's words."
This makes sense, does it not? Objective findings not say so.
You ask us to believe reputable sources, and the unnamed those who, who Obama personally chose.
Factcheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate [sic]. We conclude that it meets all of the requirements from the State Department for proving U.S. citizenship.
So the Factcheck staffers are your reputable sources? And you think we should take their word for it, don't you? And even if that COLB is genuine Hawaii DOH issue, we are still taking their word for it, because the anonymous bureaucrat who generated it may have had inducement, or it may have been DOH policy to issue a COLB to those foreign born.
Neither the Royal Society founders nor Freepers accept authority on someone's word. We demand the original source document (which res ipsa loquitur) so they nullius in verba.
So, please tell us how you are going to prove Obama's qualification for office without relying on any person's authority.