Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

India's Thorium cycle catches world's eye post Japanese nuke disaster
CNBC TV18 ^

Posted on 03/20/2011 7:38:49 AM PDT by Sancho1984

India's development of thorium for nuclear power generation caught world interest in the light of the blasts at Japan's nuclear power stations. CNBC-TV18’s Sanjay Suri and Anup Gomen report.

India is considered as the world leader in thorium. The Kakrapar-1 reactor located near Surat in Gujarat is the world's first reactor which uses thorium than depleted uranium for vital power generation. Compated to uranium, thorium has less fissile. The nuclear physicists are now looking at thorium as the safer model.

Ian Hore-Lacy from World Nuclear Association said, "India is the only country in the world that develops thorium fuel cycle. The expertise in India is world class and it is applied very rigorously to the safety of nuclear plants in India."

India has about 25% of the world's thorium reserves and is keen to tap thorium for the growing needs of its population," Hore-Lacy added.

Paddy Regan, Professor of Nuclear Physics from University of Surrey said, “India has a population of a billion people and has massive reserves of thorium. India's nuclear programme, based on the thorium cycle, is slightly different. Indian model thorium based reactors seem to be a very sensible way to go."

Pioneering Indian technology using thorium rather than uranium generated new interest around the world. Thorium is considered less efficient but certainly is much safer. In the light of what has happened in Japan, critics are less inclined to dismiss thorium than they were before.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: energy; fission; helium3; india; japan; nuclear; thorium
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 03/20/2011 7:38:54 AM PDT by Sancho1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sancho1984
The nuclear physicists are now looking at thorium as the safer model.

Edward Teller started pushing the idea of Thorium reactors in the late 1950's. He supported and promoted the idea until his death in 2003. These boys are a little late to the party.....

2 posted on 03/20/2011 7:45:45 AM PDT by Thermalseeker (The theft being perpetrated by Congress and the Fed makes Bernie Maddoff look like a pickpocket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sancho1984

“...-Because nearly all of the thorium is used up in an LFTR (versus only about 0.7% of uranium mined for an LWR), the reactor achieves high energy production per metric ton of fuel ore, on the order of 300 times the output of a typical uranium LWR. The LFTR allows much higher operating temperatures than does a typical LWR therefore a higher thermodynamic efficiency. The turbine system believed best suited for its operation is a triple-reheat closed-cycle helium turbine system, which should convert 50% of the reactor heat into electricity compared to today’s steam cycle (~25% to 33%). This efficiency gain translates to about 4.11 million barrels of crude oil equivalent per year more than that generated by a steam system. Capital costs are lower due to smaller reactor & turbo-machinery size, low reactor pressures and minimal redundant safety systems. The greater energy production capability of LFTRs means we estimate the cost for electricity from a LFTR plant could be 25% to over 50% less than that from a LWR.

Waste—In theory, LFTRs would produce far less waste along their entire process chain, from ore extraction to nuclear waste storage, than LWRs. A LFTR power plant would generate 4,000 times less mining waste (solids and liquids of similar character to those in uranium mining) and would generate 1,000 to 10,000 times less nuclear waste than an LWR. Additionally, because LFTR burns all of its nuclear fuel, the majority of the waste products (83%) are safe within 10 years, and the remaining waste products (17%) need to be stored in geological isolation for only about 300 years (compared to 10,000 years or more for LWR waste). ...”

from: http://www.thoriumenergy.org/lftradsrisks.html


3 posted on 03/20/2011 7:57:40 AM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sancho1984

>India is considered as the world leader in thorium. The Kakrapar-1 reactor located near Surat in Gujarat is the world’s first reactor which uses thorium than depleted uranium for vital power generation.

I remember a day when that sentence was routinely applied to American achievements...

Now?


4 posted on 03/20/2011 8:01:43 AM PDT by bill1952 (Choice is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sancho1984
Gujarat is the world's first reactor which uses thorium than depleted uranium

Looks like the reporter has established his or her knowledge level.

5 posted on 03/20/2011 8:04:19 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker

If they are late to the party then when did we build such reactors?

Now, ideas are fine.
Scientists are fine, of course but as my uncle Nickolaus Gabriel, who was a NASA aerospace engineer designing re entry capsules told me, I am not a scientist.
I am an engineer.
We actually build the things that scientists think about.

My thanks to uncle Nick.

never forgot that. Or him.


6 posted on 03/20/2011 8:07:18 AM PDT by bill1952 (Choice is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker
These boys are a little late to the party.....

But they're at the party. We, on the other hand....

7 posted on 03/20/2011 8:08:19 AM PDT by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sancho1984
From Lunar Pioneer Online

8 posted on 03/20/2011 8:33:11 AM PDT by Prospero (non est ad astra mollis e terris via)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
<>depleted uranium

Yup, it's all enriched from the naturally available ore, it's only depleted compared to weapons grade uranium.

9 posted on 03/20/2011 8:41:24 AM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bill1952
We actually build the things that scientists think about.

Provided the research scientists can convince the people with money that the "thing" is worth building.

I'm an engineer (MSEE, BSAE). I cannot tell you how many times over the course of my career I've been frustrated by bean counters stopping projects or never even considering worthy projects, not because they lacked merit, but rather because the bean counter didn't have the foggiest idea what they were looking at.....

10 posted on 03/20/2011 8:41:59 AM PDT by Thermalseeker (The theft being perpetrated by Congress and the Fed makes Bernie Maddoff look like a pickpocket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sancho1984

Bfl


11 posted on 03/20/2011 8:55:13 AM PDT by GoDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bill1952
"India is considered as the world leader in thorium."
I remember a day when that sentence was routinely applied to American achievements...
Now?

That was before we had fully ceded the American educational system to the libs.

It's still possibly to get an excellent education here but you have to be very motivated and work hard. Lots of foreign students here have both, less so the American students who've accepted the "feel-good" line.

12 posted on 03/20/2011 9:03:30 AM PDT by sionnsar (IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|http://pure-gas.org|Must be a day for changing taglines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
Looks like the reporter has established his or her knowledge level.

And knowledge of English with this statement:

Compated to uranium, thorium has less fissile.

Compated? That's a new one.

Also, where can I get some of this "fissile?" I always thought fissile was an adverb rather than a noun.

13 posted on 03/20/2011 9:10:33 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault (Our Constitution: the new Inconvenient Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

Doh! I mean ADJECTIVE!


14 posted on 03/20/2011 9:11:34 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault (Our Constitution: the new Inconvenient Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
Looks like the reporter has established his or her knowledge level.

I also like the fact that "thorium has less fissile."

15 posted on 03/20/2011 9:22:56 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker
Provided the research scientists can convince the people with money that the "thing" is worth building.

And the thing worth building to the people with the money (government) in 1950's-70's America was a reactor that would produce Pu-239 to top ICBMs with.

The uranium cycle does that, the thorium cycle does not.

16 posted on 03/20/2011 10:09:23 AM PDT by seowulf ("If you write a whole line of zeroes, it's still---nothing"...Kira Alexandrovna Argounova)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker

Don’t blame the bean counter. Blame the ones who put him/her in that position with that authority. Or perhaps it was the policies which were decided by committees. That is just one of the beauties of bureaucracy.


17 posted on 03/20/2011 10:43:25 AM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
Looks like the reporter has established his or her knowledge level.

Maybe the sentence was supposed to read "then depleted uranium". A thorium reactor could burn depleted uranium by breeding it to plutonium-239, the same way it burns thorium by breeding it to U-233.

18 posted on 03/20/2011 11:27:01 AM PDT by Campion ("Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies when they become fashions." -- GKC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Prospero

Cool, we should get good at it here, and then build a moon base and use it. No, wait, the Muslims and Obama worship the moon and have prohibited us from returning to it. sigh.


19 posted on 03/20/2011 11:27:25 AM PDT by FreeAtlanta (Obama and the left are making a mockery of our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

www.energyfromthorium.com

We developed them at Oak Ridge a long time ago...


20 posted on 03/20/2011 12:43:31 PM PDT by fred2008
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson