To: topher; M. Espinola; Quix; Joya; blam; reed13; B4Ranch; investigateworld
Historical readings average about 28 for Los Angeles. A moment ago I saw a reading of 65 on the LA geiger counter. To put this in perspective -- 100 is considered to be high.
Note: This is just a small sample from Santa Monica. It is not official. That single unit might be out of order. Then, again, local radiation levels may actually be going up.
LOL !
58 posted on
03/18/2011 6:20:49 AM PDT by
ex-Texan
(Ecclesiastes 5:10 - 20)
To: topher; M. Espinola; Quix; Joya; blam; reed13; B4Ranch; investigateworld
59 posted on
03/18/2011 6:30:17 AM PDT by
ex-Texan
(Ecclesiastes 5:10 - 20)
To: ex-Texan
We seem to have a station in our lap, now. Yea for that.
I wish they’d spread Denver’s stations out enough to see the numbers.
83 posted on
03/20/2011 7:18:16 PM PDT by
Quix
(Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson