Posted on 03/16/2011 9:55:25 AM PDT by Mozilla
Conservative radio talk show host Mark Levin is clearly a supporter of Israel, but on yesterday’s show, Levin passionately urged them to ignore American leaders and do whatever is necessary to protect themselves. Although many will find his loyalty to Israel commendable, others will likely question whether any foreign leader should be encouraged to tell an American president to go to hell.
Levin’s declaration to Israel:
“My advice to the Israelis? No more land, no more peace. . . . Be prepared for war at all times. . . . Tell Obama to go to hell, tell Hillary Clinton to get lost. And be done with them. And by the way, then they’ll respect you. I’m just telling you now, you’re going to get no support from this government and if you don’t protect yourselves, you won’t survive.”
(Excerpt) Read more at mediaite.com ...
Saudi Arabia pays for theirs. But hey, if Egypt or Jordan or any other country wants to tell us to go to hell I'm all for cutting them off as well.
Amen to that. We give Israel enormous amounts of money. If they want to be on their own, then they need to depend on themselves. He who pays the piper, calls the tune.
And those "others" were the first to internationally denounce every action taken by George Bush.
When the Great One speaks, everyone listens!
Mark is ‘bout the only voice I can take these days.
Even Maharushi gets distracted..and since Operation Chaos..well....
Mark is a core Constitutional scholar, has his facts straight and is not afraid to stick it to the Lefties.
As for BO, Go to H**L, you big dope!
If this happens the Arabs will move closer and devote their clever and perverted minds to undermining security within the Israeli bunker state.
Agitation cum terrorism by Israeli Arabs to end ‘the Zionist essence’ of Israel will be one arm of this struggle. If the Israelis eventually buckle to that campaign (and this is 25 years or more away) then the Jewish community in Israel is pretty much finished as the Arabs will move on to a ‘Lebanese solution’ in which the ‘infidels’ , in this case Maronite Christians. are squeezed out by civil war and persistent terror and ethnic violence. The Maronites went from the ruling faction in Lebanon to a dispersed minority dealing now with their own diaspora. This has also been the fate of the Christian Arabs of the Westbank.
I firmly believe in some not fully rational sense the fate of Israel as Israel and the fate of the United States as a free nation, not the world's largest banana republic, are at some level inextricably connected and the course of events at play in the world does not make me feel optimistic about the long run prospects of either.
Agree with your assessment.
And I wasn’t suggesting a Masada end to this story but I’m fairly certain the Israelis will die to the last man before allowing themselves to be driven into the sea. These are pretty tough people and they have strong memories of what happened in Germany when they failed to resist in time.
As goes Israel, so goes the West.
My late Lebanese Christian brother-in-law’s grandfather moved the entire family to the Caribbean from the Beruit area many, many years ago when the muslim persecution of Christians there became intolerable and the growing violence between the muslims and Christians threatened to spill into the family.
But, as we all know now, islam is the “religion of peace.”
What most folks fail to understand is that there are several definitions of “peace.”
One is the absence of war or conflict. The other is absence of RESISTANCE TO MY IDEOLOGY, THEOLOGY OR WAY OF DOING THINGS – the “peace” of the grave.
The muslims – just like Obama — have thoroughly embraced the latter definition.
One has to wonder just how much the topic explored in the piece below plays into the insane Arab obsession with the destruction of Israel and any who support her.
AN ENLIGHTENING ARTICLE ON MUSLIM INBREEDING!
Nicolai Sennels is a Danish psychologist who has done extensive research into a little-known problem in the Muslim world: the disastrous results of Muslim inbreeding brought about by the marriage of first-cousins.
This practice, which has been prohibited in the Judeo-Christian tradition since the days of Moses, was sanctioned by Muhammad and has been going on now for 50 generations (1,400 years) in the Muslim world.
This practice of inbreeding will never go away in the Muslim world since Muhammad is the ultimate example and authority on all matters, including marriage.
The massive inbreeding in Muslim culture may well have done virtually irreversible damage to the Muslim gene pool, including extensive damage to its intelligence, sanity, and health. According to Sennels, close to half of all Muslims in the world are inbred. In Pakistan, the numbers approach 70%. Even in England, more than half of Pakistani immigrants are married to their first cousins, and in Denmark the number of inbred Pakistani immigrants is around 40%.
The numbers are equally devastating in other important Muslim countries: 67% in Saudi Arabia, 64% in Jordan and Kuwait, 63% in Sudan, 60% in Iraq, and 54% in the United Arab Emirates and Qatar.
According to the BBC, this Pakistani, Muslim-inspired inbreeding is thought to explain the probability that a British Pakistani family is more than 13 times as likely to have children with recessive genetic disorders. While Pakistanis are responsible for three percent of the births in the UK , they account for 33% of children with genetic birth defects.
The risk of what are called autosomal recessive disorders such as cystic fibrosis and spinal muscular atrophy is 18 times higher and the risk of death due to malformations is 10 times higher.
Other negative consequences of inbreeding include a 100 percent increase in the risk of stillbirths and a 50% increase in the possibility that a child will die during labor.
Lowered intellectual capacity is another devastating consequence of Muslim marriage patterns. According to Sennels, research shows that children of consanguineous marriages lose 10-16 points off their IQ and that social abilities develop much slower in inbred babies.
The risk of having an IQ lower than 70, the official demarcation for being classified as retarded, increases by an astonishing 400 percent among children of cousin marriages.
(Similar effects were seen in the Pharaonic dynasties in ancient Egypt and in the British royal family, where inbreeding was the norm for a significant period of time.)
In Denmark, non-Western immigrants are more than 300 percent more likely to fail the intelligence test required for entrance into the Danish army.
Sennels says that the ability to enjoy and produce knowledge and abstract thinking is simply lower in the Islamic world. He points out that the Arab world translates just 330 books every year, about 20% of what Greece alone does.
In the last 1,200 years of Islam, just 100,000 books have been translated into Arabic, about what Spain does in a single year. Seven out of 10 Turks have never even read a book.
Sennels points out the difficulties this creates for Muslims seeking to succeed in the West. A lower IQ, together with a religion that denounces critical thinking, surely makes it harder for many Muslims to have success in our high-tech knowledge societies.
Only nine Muslims have every won the Nobel Prize and five of those were for the Peace Prize. According to Nature magazine, Muslim countries produce just 10 percent of the world average when it comes to scientific research (measured by articles per million inhabitants).
In Denmark, Sennels native country, Muslim children are grossly over represented among children with special needs. One-third of the budget for Danish schools is consumed by special education, and anywhere from 51% to 70% of retarded children with physical handicaps in Copenhagen have an immigrant background.
Learning ability is severely affected as well. Studies indicated that 64% of school children with Arabic parents are still illiterate after 10 years in the Danish school system. The immigrant drop-out rate in Danish high schools is twice that of the native-born.
Mental illness is also a product. The closer the blood relative, the higher the risk of schizophrenic illness. The increased risk of insanity may explain why more than 40% of the patients in Denmark’s biggest ward for clinically insane criminals have an immigrant background.
The U.S. is not immune. According to Sennels, One study based on 300,000 Americans shows that the majority of Muslims in the USA have a lower income, are less educated, and have worse jobs than the population as a whole.
Sennels concludes:
There is no doubt that the wide spread tradition of first cousin marriages among Muslims has harmed the gene pool among Muslims. Because Muslims’ religious beliefs prohibit marrying non-Muslims and thus prevents them from adding fresh genetic material to their population, the genetic damage done to their gene pool since their prophet allowed first cousin marriages 1,400 years ago are most likely massive. (This has produced overwhelming direct and indirect human and societal consequences.)
Bottom line: Islam is not simply a benign and morally equivalent alternative to the Judeo-Christian tradition. As Sennels points out, the first and biggest victims of Islam are Muslims. Simple Christian compassion for Muslims and a common-sense desire to protect Western civilization from the ravages of Islam dictate a vigorous opposition to the spread of this dark and dangerous religion. These stark realities must be taken into account when we establish public policies dealing with immigration from Muslim countries and the building of mosques in the US.
Thanks!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.