Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Russian Army weaponry 'inferior' to NATO's, overpriced
Ria Novosti ^ | 15/03/2011

Posted on 03/16/2011 8:41:03 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

New Russian Army weaponry 'inferior' to NATO's, overpriced

T-90

© RIA Novosti.

The most advanced weapon systems manufactured for Russia's ground forces are below NATO and even Chinese standards and are expensive, GF chief Col. Gen. Alexander Postnikov said on Tuesday.

"The weapon models that are manufactured by our industry, including armor, artillery and small arms and light weapons, fail to meet the standards that exist in NATO and even China," he said at a session of the Defense and Security Committee of the upper house of the Russian parliament.

He said that Russia's most advanced tank, the T-90, is in fact a modification of the Soviet-era T-72 tank [entered production in 1971] but costs 118 million rubles (over $4 million) per unit.

"It would be easier for us to buy three Leopards [Germany's main battle tanks] with this money," Postnikov said.

MOSCOW, March 15 (RIA Novosti)


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: armsbuildup; mbt; nato; russia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 03/16/2011 8:41:07 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
"Quantity has a quality all it's own"

/johnny

2 posted on 03/16/2011 8:47:10 AM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I think they will fall farther and farther behind in weapons development. They are about the same size (in population) as Japan.


3 posted on 03/16/2011 8:48:05 AM PDT by texmexis best
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
"The weapon models that are manufactured by our industry, including armor, artillery and small arms and light weapons, fail to meet the standards that exist in NATO and even China,"

They can sell it to the Indians; India seems to like Russian crap.
4 posted on 03/16/2011 8:49:10 AM PDT by ThinkingBuddha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ThinkingBuddha
India is the worlds largest weapons importer. And the Ak’s created by Ivan have went toe to toe with high priced light arms.
5 posted on 03/16/2011 8:52:52 AM PDT by Palter (If voting made any difference they wouldn't let us do it. ~ Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Old Soviet doctorine was based on numbers, anyway. I remember reading an account of the German study of a captured T-34 in WWII. They basically came to the conclusion the tank would not pass their QC standards for production. Nevertheless, there it was, eventually rolling through the streets of Berlin.


6 posted on 03/16/2011 8:54:10 AM PDT by edpc (Tagline under construction: Your American Recovery and Reinvestment Act dollars at work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThinkingBuddha

Probably because they can upgrade that crap with Western subsystems and get it to work.

Besides you only get some kinds of crap from the Russians.


7 posted on 03/16/2011 8:57:03 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Palter

There are two distinct issues here-one with the Russian military and another with the arms industry. A large number of ‘new systems’ they are buying such as frigates and bomber aircraft are based on hulls or air frames launched in the 90s. You can’t expect their armor capabilities to be much better.


8 posted on 03/16/2011 8:59:36 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

The Russian military is facing a dearth of both.


9 posted on 03/16/2011 9:00:31 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: texmexis best
They are about the same size (in population) as Japan.
10 posted on 03/16/2011 9:03:37 AM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: edpc

Yeah, but their tanks and fighters haven’t done so well.

Still, I think this is more of a “negotiating stance.”


11 posted on 03/16/2011 9:04:05 AM PDT by Little Ray (The Gods of the Copybook Heading, with terror and slaughter return!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Yeah, well, I wouldn't have a full-auto AK if you gave me one.

You can disprove this by giving me one. :-)

12 posted on 03/16/2011 9:05:57 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texmexis best
My reply line did not display, for some reason: They are about the same size (in population) as Japan.

And it decreased by about 750,000 per year.

13 posted on 03/16/2011 9:06:30 AM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
“Quantity has a quality all it's own”

/johnny”

Exactly that is what Stalin was saying in WWll.

14 posted on 03/16/2011 9:11:48 AM PDT by Cheetahcat ( November 4 2008 ,A date which will live in Infamy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: edpc
The German assessment of the T-34 probably put too much emphasis on fit and finish. The T-34 was tough and quite formidable. Some say it was better than any German tank.
15 posted on 03/16/2011 9:13:54 AM PDT by ryan71 (Dear spell check - No, I will not capitalize the "m" in moslem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
You can buy Leopard tanks for 1.3 million?

Mike

16 posted on 03/16/2011 9:16:18 AM PDT by MichaelP (The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools ~HS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc
They basically came to the conclusion the tank would not pass their QC standards for production.

The Nazi's had QC standards requiring most tank components to last three to five years at a time when the average life expectancy for a tank was about two weeks.

17 posted on 03/16/2011 9:37:13 AM PDT by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: edpc

The reason why the t-34 worked for them was they produced it in such numbers they lost a bunch but enough of them could take out enemy tanks and they still had many left to keep rolling.


18 posted on 03/16/2011 9:39:17 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ryan71; edpc

Germans built their tanks to last for a long time. The Russians built theirs to be easy to manufacture, realizing that they would probably not have a long life in combat, thus didn’t expect them to ‘last forever.’


19 posted on 03/16/2011 9:40:23 AM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ThinkingBuddha
They can sell it to the Indians; India seems to like Russian crap.

For decades, Russian crap was all the Indians could buy. We were (and still are) busy arming the Pakistanis. But India now seems to be buying arms from Europe too. If we're smart, we'll get in on that market - could mean a lot of jobs at Boeing, Lockheed, Raytheon, etc.
20 posted on 03/16/2011 9:42:11 AM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson