Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: meyer
why the heck is dangerous ‘spent fuel’ being stored above a working nuclear reactor in the first place? Couldn’t find some place more dangerous to put it? I sort-of asked that question 2 days ago. :)

After thinking about it, the answer is simple. When refueling, the overhead crane can pull the fuel rod assembly right out of the reactor and then set it down in the pool. No need to take the fuel rods outside. Easy transfer.

First off, it's a first gen reactor. In later models the pool is at or below grade in insanely think concrete and steel. Add to that that the pond is only meant to be a termporary storage area while the fuel cools completely down when it then can be more easily moved for disposal or recycling. Now since recycling fuel is now banned and there is no place to dump it...

1,223 posted on 03/16/2011 7:13:30 PM PDT by Drill Thrawl (I don't prep for the disaster. I prepare for the rebuilding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1215 | View Replies ]


To: Drill Thrawl
Now since recycling fuel is now banned and there is no place to dump it...

Is it banned in Japan? I know that France recycles, but the US has banned it since Jimmy Carter's executive order mandated it.

1,225 posted on 03/16/2011 7:16:25 PM PDT by meyer (We will not sit down and shut up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1223 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson