Posted on 03/15/2011 7:38:48 AM PDT by GonzoII
Earlier I was seeing the microsievert unit used. Until we know what “unit” they are talking about we are just wild ass guessing unfortunately.
If they are indeed using millisieverts now, that is a whole nother can of poop.
YOu make it all sound so safe.
HOWEVER
lets point to a few things.
TEPCO lied and had to have all the plants closed down years ago.
It falsified safety tests on a containment vessel.
Is it true that this organization
Has said that only 1 MG of Plutonium should be released from a MOX facility under safety guidelines verus 2 KG of uranium in an accidental release.
They are using millisieverts. Thus the no fly zone and the evacuation in a 20 kilometer radius last night.
400 MILLIESEVERTS outside of Reactor 3.
So let’s say the worst happens at Reactor 3.
No wind damage to California.
But plutonium has been released in Japan.
Why about radioactive materials coming from people and imports.
And no, there is no comparison to Chornobil because LWR fuel, as we are seeing, does not undergo an explosive energy release. It is a slower process. Less energy, less dispersion. The explosions we have seen so far are most likely from a buildup of hydrogen gas. The explosive process is not within the fuel material.
You didn’t really answer my question.
We know that TEPCO has had issues about the safety of their containment vessels .
So, is this true:
Have they said that only 1 MG of Plutonium should be released from a MOX facility under safety guidelines verus 2 KG of uranium in an accidental release.
If anything, those numbers seem high to me. The ratio of Pu to U seems about right, at least in the ball park. Remember that we are only talking about 7% of the original material being Pu. That gets you an order of magnitude right off the bat. The difference in diffusion coefficients and mobility, plate-out rates and trapping mechanisms, probably gets you another 3 orders of magnitude. So you are down from KG to tens of milligrams. Without running the particular models, probably differences in dilution rates gives you another order of magnitude. So I can see how you'd probably get in the range of five orders of magnitude difference.
BTW, plutonium has been released in Japan before. The Nagasaki weapon dispersed kilograms quantities of material in the local area, and vaporized quite a lot (a weapon generates more heat than a core accident). Last I checked, they had cleaned up pretty well from an event infinitely worse than anything we'll see here:
“Four reactors at the plant have now exploded. “
No reactors have exploded.
They were using millisieverts last night.
The one 400 reading was unusual and may be an anomaly.
It dropped back into the micro range a few hours later.
This chart of the time around the fire is in micros:
melted down reactor cores do not “blow up”
they melt down
The explosions you are seeing are coming from vented hydrogen and other gasses, they are not nuclear detonations
What is unclear from GOJ reports is how much radiation iis being intentionally vented with the gas buildups from each reactor to reduce pressures and heat, and how much is escaping uncontrolled (and to what extent) because the core containment vessel has been breached
In Chernobyl (not remotely similar deisgn) the core was exposed and vented into the atmosphere, less primitve designs are redundant to contain at least some (most) of the material from exposure and dangerous levels of radiation from escaping in large uncontrolled plumes (exposure radius and danger level unclear in this plant, tbd, controlled venting while undesirable is probably a long term project)
the radiation if released comes from steam and dust blown off the site, which to reach the USA would have to reach an altitude to be carried acorss the Pacific and then settle
If you want to be really really alarmed, just look at the USA death toll from Three Mile Island because it melted down right in the heart of the eastern seaboard
If there are true nuc engineers here maybe they can correct any misstatements here
What happens when the spent fool pools dry up?
Thanks for the info. Had never seen that scale before.
or if not, they will figure out a way to prevent it from leeching into or migrating into the surrounding soil and groundwater (if that is an issue here) and encase and entomb it at the site -
more likely eventual removal given the seismic risks just guessing!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.