Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: flair2000
But I do know that a 72 hour (plus) loss of all AC power is one heck of a challenge, and we can only hope for the best.

I agree - I'm not nuclear at all, but I am electrical (transmission) and there are significant reasons that we give top priority to providing off-site power to nuclear plants even though they have redundant on-site power sources. What we are seeing at Fukushima right now illustrates that need well.

119 posted on 03/14/2011 12:54:58 PM PDT by meyer (We will not sit down and shut up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]


To: meyer
I agree - I'm not nuclear at all, but I am electrical (transmission) and there are significant reasons that we give top priority to providing off-site power to nuclear plants even though they have redundant on-site power sources. What we are seeing at Fukushima right now illustrates that need well.

I'd wondered about that myself. They have all kinds of redundancy of generators on site and they all got swamped by the tsunami. Off site, think higher ground, with underground transmission lines would seem to be well worth the additional cost.

127 posted on 03/14/2011 1:28:10 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson