Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: silverleaf
If the explosion was strong enough to destroy the concrete containment building, is it not reasonable to assume that the “pipes” used to supply the reactor vessal were at least damaged, and therefore they are really going to have a hard time supply cooling water (even sea water) to the core?
65 posted on 03/12/2011 10:36:42 PM PST by TGIAO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: TGIAO
again. not a nuc design expert and did not stay in Holiday Inn Express last month

but is it rational to assume all of the cooling “pipes” feeding the reactor core would be in the walls of the reactor building like the plumbing in your house?

The safety system is designed to absorb the loss of the reactor walls

So should not core cooling system “pipes” be encased and buried as is the reactor core?

Or that the Japanese have a workaround

Surely their safety engineers learned from the US mistakes at TMI, even if the systems are different

If this can all be contained there is not a more proficient and ingenious nation than Japan to do so

Now, ask why the IAEA has dithered around and watched the likes of Pakistan, North Korea and Iran become (military) nuclear powers. Better to have 6 meltdowns in Japan than ONE in any of those countries -maybe even China which has demonstrated an extraordinary lack of industrial and building code integrity

66 posted on 03/13/2011 6:29:48 AM PDT by silverleaf (All that is necessary for evil to succeed, is that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson