To: four more in O 4
Min Leader was saying the meeting prior to the vote was illegal,
—
What wool he is trying to pull is that the referral by the Senate to Committee is illegal. Which action by the Senate does not requite a quorum to implement (only fiscal items need a quorum). The Committee - from the House and Senate - removed all items with fiscal implications - once out of Committee the Bill cannot be amended by either House or Senate and must be voted up or down.
In a way, the fleebnaggers where hoisted by their own petard of absence when the vote went down.
97 posted on
03/09/2011 6:36:07 PM PST by
PIF
(They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
To: PIF
What wool he is trying to pull is that the referral by the Senate to Committee is illegal. Which action by the Senate does not requite a quorum to implement (only fiscal items need a quorum). The Committee - from the House and Senate - removed all items with fiscal implications - once out of Committee the Bill cannot be amended by either House or Senate and must be voted up or down.I think they are arguing something along the lines of a piece of legislation has to be available for 12 or 24 hours for review. The Republicans only allowed 2 hours.
They are grasping at straws, but this is what they are claiming.
To: PIF
In a way, the fleebnaggers where hoisted by their own petard of absence when the vote went down.
Bullseye!!
Good Shot.
124 posted on
03/09/2011 6:51:53 PM PST by
four more in O 4
(God loves us, he gave us: November 2nd 2010.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson