Posted on 03/07/2011 10:25:32 AM PST by SonsOfLibertyII
Why did it take a freedom of information act request for us to see one of the main video sources of 911? Why didn't the people on the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, tell us about it or at least identify it as a significant source?
Ok so they may come up with the excuse oh, we just forgot to mention we had it. What else do they have? Its time for Conservatives to form their own committee and make a determination of who should have been fired.
Yeah that German philosopher is dead, ha.
Been seen many many times. This is someone’s idea of a revelation?
Where is your evidence that it has been seen before? Can you post any reference to it or a portion of it? Are you claiming you yourself saw it? Is there some youtube site for all of it or a portion of it that you can cite? If not then why make such an unsubstantiated claim?
This is the real enigma. Not the fact that the tape was never release, but what happened to the collapse footage.
This is the real enigma. Not the fact that the tape was never release, but what happened to the collapse footage.
I noticed that it was edited too.
It is stupid to not show it or other horrible things. It is information control. Not that I wanted to see horrible things on purpose. I do not believe in censorship of any kind.
Also, some motion pictures digitally erased the twin towers from the film.
It is like they were never there in real life.
i dont know if it was cut or just stopped and restarted again.
how do you really know that the tower started collapsing at that point? I see nothing to indicate that.
Thank you very much
happy to help. I understand completely :)
Any idea why I have no sound from U Tube?
The day we lost our innocence here
Later.
My evidence is in my memory. That's inside my skull.
Are you claiming you yourself saw it?
No, I am STATING that I myself saw several portions of this footage many times in 2001. And if I saw it, millions of other people saw it too. It was on TV in New York. Local and national programming. It is not "secret footage".
Is there some youtube site for all of it or a portion of it that you can cite?
If youtube even existed in 2001, most of us here were not utilizing it.
If not then why make such an unsubstantiated claim?
It's not a claim, and it's not unsubstantiated. I've seen it before. I recognized it immediately.
sauropd's wife
Correct me if I’m wrong - but I see no new evidence in this clip.
“Pick your battles”?
Almost 10 years and it still feels like yesterday...
“Not one person was fired in our gov after 3,000 people were murdered.”
O.K., out of curiosity, I’ll take the bait: Who, exactly, in your opinion, should have been fired?
“I am not posting this as support for some conspiracy, but it gives credence to those 911 truthers, that we get this drip drip of evidence”
I don’t find anything in or about this video to consider it new “evidence” in any material way.
The particular angle and “point of view” of the camera in this particular helicopter might be different than other still and moving images taken at the same time, but the result of the images it provides does not provide anything “new”, any “new” evidence, that other images and facts did not and has not already provided.
The facts makes your “drip drip” angle - concerning this video - just silly.
“Its time for Conservatives to form their own committee and make a determination of who should have been fired.”
Since it’s your idea, why don’t you start the process here, by telling us who you think should be on the list of “should have been fired”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.