[Terpfen]

Yeah, that chart isn’t biased at all. Nope.

Since when is “Mormon” code for “unelectable”, by the way? I don’t think anyone cares that Huntsman or Romney are Mormons. Hell, I don’t think anyone cares about them regardless.

[Minus_The_Bear]

"Since when is “Mormon” code for “unelectable”, by the way?"

____________________________________________________________

Uhhh... belonging to an organization that didn't allow blacks to join until 1978 makes you unelected able. The media will be all over that. Jeremiah Wright double standard.

[COgamer]

“Since when is “Mormon” code for “unelectable”, by the way? I don’t think anyone cares that Huntsman or Romney are Mormons. Hell, I don’t think anyone cares about them regardless.”

The word “flip-flopper” in that list is by far the reason most people of all political stripes completely distrust Mitt Romney.

That said, someone running for president, especially as a Republican, pretty much requires the dedicated Christian vote. Opinions of Mormonism and its validity as a religion vary greatly.

[magritte]

Many Evangelicals who consider Mormons “false Christians” will NOT vote for a Mormon and that hurts Romney in the general...magritte

[vette6387]

I care a lot, and I am a Mormon. That said, I don’t trust any of them (Mormons), they cannot be independent thinkers and be a true believer in Momonism. Mormonism treats women very little better than Islam. No Mormons, no Muslims for me.

[newzjunkey]

Since when is “Mormon” code for “unelectable”, by the way?

Been around these parts lately?

The chart is pretty silly. For example, Huckabee's problem is less that he's evangelical then that his record is awful and he cannot escape his clemency grant to a man who murdered cops and raped children.

I'm not thrilled with any of the potential candidates but I suppose what I think doesn't mean a damn since CA is moving back to a JUNE presidential primary date if AB-80 passes with the excuse of "cost cutting" and "we didn't matter anyway."