To: Fennie
The aircraft carrier USS Enterprise, which had been on pirate-hunting duty off the coast of Somalia, has now steamed to the mouth of the Suez Canal in the Red Sea.I know that anti-piracy ops are a secondary function for any naval warship, but to task a carrier strike group with the job is just a huge waste of resources given the Rules of Engagement.
14 posted on
03/01/2011 4:48:46 AM PST by
Tallguy
(Received a fine from the NFL for a helmet-to-helmet hit.)
To: Tallguy
I know that anti-piracy ops are a secondary function for any naval warship, but to task a carrier strike group with the job is just a huge waste of resources given the Rules of Engagement. You're right. That would seem to be more of a "Frigate Navy" type mission. Maybe some air support with AWACS - possibly even, gulp, land-based from our AF friends - to spot likely surface targets. What are bammy's ROE, is the Navy even allowed to approach a suspected pirate ship? Or is that maybe considered too threatening? Is he just trying to "send a message" with "a presence" there? He's real good about just being present...
19 posted on
03/01/2011 4:56:18 AM PST by
ThunderSleeps
(Stop obama now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
To: Tallguy
But damn it they have the big “BOO” signs.
To: Tallguy
I know that anti-piracy ops are a secondary function for any naval warship, but to task a carrier strike group with the job is just a huge waste of resources given the Rules of Engagement.
Depends on what the real purpose of the mission is. If it's purely counter-piracy ops I'd agree. However, if the CSG is there for a limited duration and more to conduct "training" in a live environment, it's acceptable.
Like how, in WWII, US carriers steaming out to join the 3rd/5th fleet would detour to go bomb Wake Island.
To: Tallguy
Concur, I did LEO ops (chased druggies)in the Caribbean in the early 90’s from Knox and Perry class frigates flying H-2’s. Pretty much a big waste of resources.
To: Tallguy
No kidding. The proper response would be the use of an LHD and marines to bomb the pirate ships in port and raid the coastal villages that support for the pirates.
86 posted on
03/01/2011 10:38:30 AM PST by
rmlew
(You want change? Vote for the most conservative electable in your state or district.)
To: Tallguy
I know that anti-piracy ops are a secondary function for any naval warship, but to task a carrier strike group with the job is just a huge waste of resources given the Rules of Engagement. When you spend $600 billion a year on the military you can afford to park a carrier off the coast of Somalia to hunt for guys with big foreheads driving speedboats and derelict motherships.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson