Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fennie
The aircraft carrier USS Enterprise, which had been on pirate-hunting duty off the coast of Somalia, has now steamed to the mouth of the Suez Canal in the Red Sea.

I know that anti-piracy ops are a secondary function for any naval warship, but to task a carrier strike group with the job is just a huge waste of resources given the Rules of Engagement.

14 posted on 03/01/2011 4:48:46 AM PST by Tallguy (Received a fine from the NFL for a helmet-to-helmet hit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tallguy
I know that anti-piracy ops are a secondary function for any naval warship, but to task a carrier strike group with the job is just a huge waste of resources given the Rules of Engagement.

You're right. That would seem to be more of a "Frigate Navy" type mission. Maybe some air support with AWACS - possibly even, gulp, land-based from our AF friends - to spot likely surface targets. What are bammy's ROE, is the Navy even allowed to approach a suspected pirate ship? Or is that maybe considered too threatening? Is he just trying to "send a message" with "a presence" there? He's real good about just being present...

19 posted on 03/01/2011 4:56:18 AM PST by ThunderSleeps (Stop obama now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Tallguy

But damn it they have the big “BOO” signs.


26 posted on 03/01/2011 5:10:35 AM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Tallguy
I know that anti-piracy ops are a secondary function for any naval warship, but to task a carrier strike group with the job is just a huge waste of resources given the Rules of Engagement.

Depends on what the real purpose of the mission is. If it's purely counter-piracy ops I'd agree. However, if the CSG is there for a limited duration and more to conduct "training" in a live environment, it's acceptable.

Like how, in WWII, US carriers steaming out to join the 3rd/5th fleet would detour to go bomb Wake Island.
30 posted on 03/01/2011 5:20:29 AM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Tallguy

Concur, I did LEO ops (chased druggies)in the Caribbean in the early 90’s from Knox and Perry class frigates flying H-2’s. Pretty much a big waste of resources.


62 posted on 03/01/2011 6:47:53 AM PST by phormer phrog phlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Tallguy

No kidding. The proper response would be the use of an LHD and marines to bomb the pirate ships in port and raid the coastal villages that support for the pirates.


86 posted on 03/01/2011 10:38:30 AM PST by rmlew (You want change? Vote for the most conservative electable in your state or district.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Tallguy
I know that anti-piracy ops are a secondary function for any naval warship, but to task a carrier strike group with the job is just a huge waste of resources given the Rules of Engagement.

When you spend $600 billion a year on the military you can afford to park a carrier off the coast of Somalia to hunt for guys with big foreheads driving speedboats and derelict motherships.

110 posted on 03/01/2011 3:30:34 PM PST by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson