[Ann Archy]

Yeah, but when a Democrat lawmaker shows up it costs even MORE!!

[Crawdad]

Why hasn’t the gov. been screaming this fact?

[workerbee]

Isn’t there not a single one of these pukes who have the guts to step forward and vote? Not one? Is every one of them a despicable, cowardly, unAmerican piece of feces?

[TheBattman]

Even more proof that the Demos don’t care about saving the state any money. That $165 million not wasted could have been a bargaining chip. But no - wasting other-people’s money is what the Dems do best.

[Hamilcar_Barca]

Democrat Senators disgraceful action will now be paid for by the people of Wisconsin. So what's new? The layoffs will be starting shortly as the state will be short of funds for the fiscal year ending 6/30/2011. Without the senators the budget hole doesn't get plugged. Of course it's the least senior who get laid off so the unions or senior staff don't care. The liberals and the news media will use the laid off staff as Republican victims.

[eyedigress]

Just start printing pink slips governor. You also need to hire a PR camp to make sure it is understood what it means to be a leader.

[TheBattman]

Democrats are all about the “democratic process” until the voters send another bunch up to do their will...

[garjog]

[Steely Tom]

Democrats prefer to waste taxpayer money by giving it to their pals. If that option is unavailable, they’ll settle for just pissing it away for nothing.

[bcr100]

Democrats just love spending and wasting money, especially when it isn’t their money they are wasting. The unions need to go down now, which will be a major blow to the democrats. Makes me wonder what will happen to corrupt Chicago politics if they don’t have all of that union money coming in.

[Traveler59]

Oh crap, I hate it when I find out one of the Flee-baggers lives just over the hill from the family homestead in Alma, WI. Strange though, I though most of the people I grew up with in that area were conservatives... Well, at least compared to the idiots in Madison (Mad-City).

[Brilliant]

Yes, but $165 million is chicken feed to a Democrat.

[fightinJAG]

Democrat Senator's Absence"

You mean to tell me ONE Senator's absence costs $165M?

C'mon, Mr. Boehmke/American Thinker.

We have enough insults to our intelligence without your title writers getting plural possessives wrong.

[sionnsar]

The headline “Democrat Senator’s absence to cost Wisconsin $165 Million” implies a singular senator. Does it refer to one in particular or is this yet another case in a LONG list of jernalists hoo kan nither rite nor spel?

[Qbert]

I wonder if the Dems have violated any statutes in causing this to happen.

[Marine_Uncle]

"The obstructionist Democrat Senators disgraceful action will now be paid for by the people tax payers of Wisconsin."
There. Fixed it.

[richardtavor]

Interesting that urpenbach doesn’t allow any comments on his site any longer, which means that he is getting a lot of negative comments..

[Signalman]

That headline is grammatically incorrect. That’s surprising since it’s The American Thinker.

[John Valentine]

Misplaced apostrophe alert!

That ought to be: “Democrat Senators’ absence to cost Wisconsin $165 Million”.

[FrankR]