Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OldNewYork
Which was, in fact, the point I made. BTW, I'm aware that there's a tribe that used to own bunch of territory running from Kansas down to Waco ~ they eventually lost even their very dimished reservation during theCivil War.

They've outmarried to the degree that 'blond" is normal ~

BTW, everybody knows how they use the term "Anglo" West of the Mississippi. Still, if I were you and had any "anglo blood" I'd take my dirk and cut a hole in my arm to let it leach out. You just don't want any of that stuff ya' know. Scotts and Sa'ami are best by test!

25 posted on 02/25/2011 5:18:45 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah

I’m not making this a racial thing, so I’m going to leave it there. Anglos, however defined - and I think Scots would be included in the demographer’s use of the term, probably even Lapps/Sami, have as much right to assert themselves in Texas as anyone else, including Hispanics with American citizenship. Illegal aliens don’t, whether they’re Hispanics in Texas or French Canadians in New England. That’s basically all I was saying.


32 posted on 02/25/2011 5:30:58 PM PST by OldNewYork (social justice isn't justice; it's just socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson