So they can understand the health crimes bill but not Judge Vinson’s entirely logical & legally correct ruling?
Basically, the law does not nor did it ever legally exist. It may exist in fact, but not legally.
Thus, it’s unenforceable.
It’s like going to Vegas, getting bombed & waking up married to a stranger. You go to court, plead you were not of sound mind, judge rules the marriage annuled.
It never legally happened.
You don’t then have to go out & get a divorce. There is no marriage to disolve.
Very much the same type of legal effect here. As a matter of law, the health crimes act does not exist.
Pretty simple.
It’s like going to Vegas, getting bombed & waking up married to a stranger. You go to court, plead you were not of sound mind, judge rules the marriage annuled.
It never legally happened.
You don’t then have to go out & get a divorce. There is no marriage to disolve.
Then the problem comes down to child support...
Somebody gots to pay.
Laz would hit it. Not a problem.