To: dont_tread_on_malik
What is it about its “unconstitutional” the Justice Department doesn’t understand?
2 posted on
02/23/2011 4:37:56 PM PST by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: goldstategop
What is it about its “unconstitutional” the Justice Department doesn’t understand? This:
unconstitutional
4 posted on
02/23/2011 4:40:35 PM PST by
bill1952
(Choice is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
To: goldstategop
What is it about its “unconstitutional” the Justice Department doesn’t understand? Because to the Obama administration, "unconstitutional" is anything that they don't like. It's a "flawed" document, don-cha-know...
21 posted on
02/23/2011 5:25:50 PM PST by
COBOL2Java
(Obama is the least qualified guy in whatever room he walks into.)
To: goldstategop
Eric Holder: “The Consti... what?”
72 posted on
02/24/2011 2:10:13 AM PST by
TheOldLady
("I am optimistic... [and] greatly heartened by the response of America in 2010..." - Lazamataz)
To: goldstategop
WHEN WILL SOMEONE START IMPEACHMENT HEARINGS?
Obama and the media are against the interests of America.
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!
75 posted on
02/24/2011 4:00:19 AM PST by
Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
(Obama:If They Bring a Knife to the Fight, We Bring a Gun (the REAL Arizona instigator))
To: goldstategop
They are requesting the court to clarify what the meaning of is is.
The contempt this Administration has shown for the Rule of Law is just breathtaking. Drop the Black Panther case after they’ve been convicted; choose not to enforce DOMA, while strictly enforcing removal of DADT. But our SCOTUS has passed on every question about whether or not this POTUS is even eligible to sit in the Oval Office.
77 posted on
02/24/2011 5:49:36 AM PST by
EDINVA
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson