10 years experience in the industry has taught me a thing or two as well!
Biology is such a specialized subject (as History can be), especially with an advanced degree, that I think whoever designed the test would bias it towards their own area of expertise.
Like if one Historian were a Middle ages specialist and the other a WWII specialist - the test would have to be on Ancient Egyptian history or something to accurately compare.
I am a Molecular Biologist by education (specializing in genetics, signal transduction, and cardiac myocytes), and a Pharmacokinetician by training (what the body does to a therapeutic).
If you found a Taxonomist to quiz me on the names of species and phylogenies, I could give an excellent discourse on HOW such things should be determined (and if he were a morphologist classifier instead of a DNA classifier we would NOT get on!) - but couldn't tell you the NAMES to save my life!
I lost my gamble. I was an astrophysicist. Why couldn’t you be a structural chemist or something like that? Molecular biology? Ouch! I’ll get killed.
Oh gosh. I didn’t even take high school biology. There simply wasn’t time. I took chem and physics and as much advanced math as I could.
I tutor quite a few students, and I have had to work with nursing students, so I had to pick up crash courses in biology to get me up to speed, and help them with their anatomy and physiology courses.
At least I think I understand what it is that you do. You tailor drugs to individuals so that they work better?