I like Mitch and I'll vote for him if he runs for President. As another poster has already pointed out, Mitch has gotten rid of collective bargaining for state workers in his first term, and his position on collective bargaining in the private sector is clear.
When this came bubbling up last week, Mitch asked that the House GOP not bring the issue to the floor until the rest of his agenda for the session--which ends in a few days--was passed. They didn't do that, so Mitch returned the favor.
>> his position on collective bargaining in the private sector is clear
Oh, it’s plenty clear to ME what it is. For Mitch, it’s A-OK if the citizens of Indiana are slaved to a union.
>> Mitch returned the favor.
Tit for tat is childish. Not what I want to see in a POTUS.
Especially when the course of action he chooses undermines an ally at the worst possible time, and is a “cut off your party’s nose to spite its face” sort of move.
No Mitch Daniels for me, thank you. Not after this BS.