So you had no need to listen to his EXTENSIVE legal argument, with quotes from legal scholars and concrete examples?
Ignorance is strength!
How about the follow up statement of the former Police officer who had conducted thousands of interviews with suspects?
No need to have facts and experience and legal arguments impinge upon your opinion!
You sit there and play deaf mute, and what do you think the trooper who thinks he saw you fail to signal will do?
And don’t be playing worm as the prof allegedly does later on in the video.
Also, dreamer, what attorney did you have vet this thing for you? I hope it wasn’t ACLU based.
You're wasting your time.