Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dragnet2

I would have to think that was more than a 6.3 quake.


49 posted on 02/21/2011 8:06:24 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: dfwgator

The shallowness has been the reason given for such devastation.


52 posted on 02/21/2011 8:07:39 PM PST by John W (Natural-born US citizen since 1955)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: dfwgator

I’s confident even those drooling in cups got the point.


54 posted on 02/21/2011 8:08:42 PM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: dfwgator

The quake was right under the city and the city is built on sand, gravel and dirt with a water table below it. Liquification is a fact there. The shaking that the city felt would have been tremendous, more than just the Richter Scale would suggest. There are other scales which quantify the severity in terms of the shaking felt and damage done. Those scales will better reflect what Christchurch is experiencing.


61 posted on 02/21/2011 8:35:26 PM PST by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson