Replies

Although you're not talking to me, I have a few questions.

I stand in awe of the cognitive firepower you employ to refute theological arguments with which you disagree.

I've been trying to follow your "arguments" but I'm not finding much from you. (Unless you are Robert Godwin, Ph.D, which I don't think you are.) Of course, it's fine to agree with another person's work and even to promote it, but it seems to me 95% of what you've posted on this thread are Godwin's words.

So when you mock another's lack of cognitive firepower, is that Godwin mocking or Matchett-PI mocking? Anyway, from what I gather, you are an old earth creationist? And young earther literalists are as batty as those who accept the current scientific explanations of origins?

I should note that your lumping "Darwinists" in with Big Bang and creation stories really makes no sense, as creation/Big Bang/whatever happened several billion years before evolution of any biological sort began.

"I've been trying to follow your "arguments" but I'm not finding much from you."

The theological "arguments" I posted aren't mine as I'm not Robert W. Godwin.

If you have a disagreement with the arguments, I suggest you go to his web site, sign up to post, and defend your positions there.

Focusing on "personalities" rather than the arguments, themselves, isn't a good place to start.