Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Half of Republican Caucus Votes With Democrats To Block Additional $22 Billion in Cuts
http://ace.mu.nu/archives/312243.php ^

Posted on 02/18/2011 5:29:05 PM PST by tnvol01

I don't even know what to say.

Read on and you will hear Rodgers, who needs to be gone as soon as possible, claiming that automatic across-the-board spending cuts are "lazy." By this, he means that this is the only fair way to make these cuts which will actually be politically palatable, and so he opposes this measure. He wants to weight each cut individually so that each constituency can come out one-by-one to demagogue the cuts and prevent them.

Okay, I give up. I wanted to give this two party system a try. Forget it. It's time for a third party, the Tea Party.

The GOP is dead to me. Hal Rodgers and posturing lying phony Eric Cantor need to be replaced.

(Excerpt) Read more at ace.mu.nu ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: facepalm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: tnvol01

Eric cantor, the POS TARP, king, there would be no tarp and no GM bailout of the unions without him and butt friend Paul Ryan.


21 posted on 02/18/2011 5:52:45 PM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tnvol01
Anrew Stiles reports at NRO:
Rep. Jack Kingston (R., Ga.), who called himself a “proud RSC member,” but voted against the measure, offered a familiar argument against cutting across-the-board, saying it would cede too much power to President Obama. “I’ve got to say to my conservative friends, when you cut across the board, who do you think is going to be in charge of where these cuts come from?” Kingston asked.

It is a familiar argument because it is the exact same rationale invoked by Senators (of both parties) who opposed a ban on earmarks. In this case, some Republicans argued that it would be better to wait and include further cuts — specific, Republican-approved cuts — in the 2012 budget that Rep. Paul Ryan (R., Wis.) will release in the spring.

Others were far more blunt in their opposition. Rep. Dan Lungren (R., Calif.) said that across-the-board cuts were “a lazy member’s way to achieve something.” And Democrats were predictably apoplectic — Rep. Jim Moran (D., Va.) said the additional cuts would “commit this country to an economic death spiral.”

On the other side, Rep. Jeff Flake (R., Ariz.), a cosponsor of the amendment, urged his colleagues to make good on their commitment to reducing the deficit. “What we’re doing here is a rounding error compared to what we’re going to have to do with entitlement spending,” he said.

Jordan said it was time for government to start making the difficult choices that American families are making on a daily basis. “It’s not pleasant to reduce spending … I get that,” he said. “But if we don’t do this, [the] future for our kids and our grand-kids is diminished.”

After the vote, Republicans on both sides of the debate sought to downplay the split within the party. Rep. Alan Nunnelee (R., Miss.), a freshman member of the appropriations committee who voted against the amendment, told NRO: “As Thomas Jefferson said ‘Every difference of opinion is not a difference of principle’… We’re committed to cutting spending, but doing it across the board is not the proper way to legislate … We need specific cuts.”


22 posted on 02/18/2011 5:52:57 PM PST by cornelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange

Just remember where you heard it first.


23 posted on 02/18/2011 5:57:10 PM PST by screaminsunshine (34 States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: tnvol01
Watched the Blackmun amendment vote on CSpan and when it failed by so many republican votes..
I WAS NOT AMUSED...

I want to know who didnt vote for it.

24 posted on 02/18/2011 5:57:15 PM PST by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RBW in PA
Can someone post a list of how each house member voted?

Dunno if there is a link, but Levin specifically mentioned Eric Cantor, Kevin McCarthy and Hal Rogers as members of the leadership that voted with the Dems.

He also mentioned rising freshman 'star' Kristi Noem as turning her back on the Tea Party and voting 'No'.

Levin was mad as hell, I can tell you that.

25 posted on 02/18/2011 5:57:23 PM PST by Al B. (Sarah Palin: "Buck up or stay in the truck.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

I agree with him, karl “the pig” Rove is working his ass off to make it happen. And obamma will be reelected.


26 posted on 02/18/2011 6:04:56 PM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

“And obamma will be reelected.”

Don’t even joke about that. We shouldn’t even have to wait until 2012; he should be impeached now, but he’s at best just polling even with a ‘generic Republican candidate’ for the next election.


27 posted on 02/18/2011 6:09:33 PM PST by OldNewYork (social justice isn't justice; it's just socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

I agree 100% and have said the same myself.

LLS


28 posted on 02/18/2011 6:13:28 PM PST by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: traditional1
I doubt it will be Jeb Bush; but it WILL be a Globalist RINO that is nominated by the Establshment.

They'll come up with another "Skull and Bones" candidate. You can bet on it.

29 posted on 02/18/2011 6:16:24 PM PST by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannolis. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
I agree with you about obama being reelected... because I can see clearly that the republican leadership will work to make certain that it happens. They simply love our money and our votes... they just hate us.

LLS

30 posted on 02/18/2011 6:18:18 PM PST by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

And what will your story be, irrespective of with whom you agree, when Jeb Bush is not nominated?

LOL


31 posted on 02/18/2011 6:18:48 PM PST by bill1952 (Choice is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Al B.
He also mentioned rising freshman 'star' Kristi Noem as turning her back on the Tea Party and voting 'No'.

I haven't followed Kristi Noem closely, but I believe one of the first things she did after being elected was to promise to continue the ethanol subsidies which are rotting our gas, costing a bundle, wasting fuel, and starving people in the third world.

It looks as if she is not what she pretended to be.

32 posted on 02/18/2011 6:19:34 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: tnvol01
Yes, I know.

33 posted on 02/18/2011 6:21:44 PM PST by I see my hands (You can know the young posters by the desperate optimism in their posts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

29 Republicans on the Appropriations Cmte......22 voted against the “cuts.”

The 3 parties are still alive & well....R’s, D’s, & Appropriators.


34 posted on 02/18/2011 6:24:41 PM PST by tnvol01 ("...answering that question w/ specificity uh, you know, is, is, uh above my pay grade.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: tnvol01

I am not trying to sound like a defeatest here but I knew when push came to shove this would happen.

Personally, and I hope to God in heaven I am proved wrong, but I think its too little too late. This wonderful country is on the very edge of the knife, I am so very scared for all of us.


35 posted on 02/18/2011 6:39:45 PM PST by waxer1 ("The Bible is the rock on which our republic rests." -Andrew Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: waxer1

bttt


36 posted on 02/18/2011 6:44:49 PM PST by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: tnvol01

I think the best approach is a primary challenge by a tea party candidate, then challenge the RINO again in the general election via the third party route if the TP candidate loses the primary.

Remember that great strides were made in 2010, but it was probably naive to think there would be a”transformation is complete” of the GOP establishment. It may require persistence over several election cycles.


37 posted on 02/18/2011 6:48:20 PM PST by almcbean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: almcbean

where can we find the actual votes?


38 posted on 02/18/2011 6:53:08 PM PST by George from New England (Escaped CT in 2006, now living north of Tampa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: George from New England

That is an outstanding question.

Several sites are reporting the amendment was defeated 147-281 (92 R’s voted to defeat the measure), but I can not find the breakdown.


39 posted on 02/18/2011 7:03:13 PM PST by tnvol01 ("...answering that question w/ specificity uh, you know, is, is, uh above my pay grade.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine
How much you want to bet?

We can have a FReeper hold our money.

How about $1k?

40 posted on 02/18/2011 7:14:03 PM PST by Osage Orange (MOLON LABE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson