Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: alarm rider

A practical problem with this judicial overreach is that it will lead admittedly inebriated people to come the conclusion, that; what the hell, I might as well drive and hope I avoid the cops, because if I stay here and sleep I will get convicted anyway. And what about people who are in a car with a designated driver? It is easy to concoct a situation where the driver might become incapacitated and the legally drunk passenger is therefore in ‘proximate control’ of the vehicle. And if a designated driver allowed a passenger with previous DUI’s into the vehicle isn’t he guilty of abetting a felony?


30 posted on 02/16/2011 8:41:25 AM PST by Old North State (Don't blame me, I voted for Pedro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Old North State
I was once in a situation where I was the only only one sober and needed to be the driver. I only had a learner's permit, but that was OK since I was in the car with a licensed driver (law didn't say the supervising driver had to be sober). Problem was, the car was a stick and I didn't know how to drive a stick. So the owner would tell me "clutch!", and he would work the stick.

We got everybody home without problems.

45 posted on 02/16/2011 9:09:58 AM PST by PapaBear3625 ("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson