Actually dingbat, I back up my statements. What you do is spout non sequiturs and cut and paste willy nilly in an attempt to imply things that are not so or to mislead.
So I guess all that verbiage boils down to RedSteel STILL telling us that its a waste of time to formally investigate whether Obama committed any criminal acts that would be impeachable offenses because of flaws in the Grand Jury system.
"All that verbiage" proves what I stated before OBot, as to
"Who runs grand juries these days? That would be government prosecutors"
While you spew nonsense as in that I saw some "movie" or something about "cameras and traffic lights" - you are idiot. I can walk the talk.
Who knew that Grand Juries are one size fits all?
Grand juries were the fourth branch of government to keep in check corrupt government official who were in the branches, but not so today. To quote the Creighton U. Law Review again:
"The federal courts were quick to uphold the federal rules when it came to deciding matters relating to the grand jury. In almost cyclical logic, the federal courts have claimed in near unison that presentments accusing unindicted persons of crime cannot be allowed, absent judge or prosecutor approval, "past unchallenged practice" notwithstanding.[100] Thus, hundreds of years of grand jury jurisprudence was overthrown by codification.[101]"
Gooberment officials did not like the idea of being investigated for wrong doing by grand juries, therefore, they are now controlled by the prosecutors.
In lieu of a criminal investigation by a skilled prosecutor, lets roll out a few more civil suits with plaintiffs who dont have standing so that a few more judges can summarily dismiss those lawsuits. Were at ninty dismissals as of now.
Hello Obot, an honest judge would let Obama defend his presidency on the merits of his case instead of hiding behind the court doctrine of standing.
While you spew nonsense as in that I saw some “movie” or something about “cameras and traffic lights” - you are idiot. I can walk the talk.
Good attorneys also know how to find and present plaintiffs who will be granted standing.
Not a single one of the major conservative law firms in America has represented a birther plaintiff. For example, why isn’t Mark Levin’s Landmark Legal Foundation representing Obama ineligibility plaintiffs and doing it “pro bono?”