BS.
You only give this “position of yours” lip service because you don’t think it’s going to happen, and you so want “credibility,” thinly as it may be, but no one really believes you. You are so full of crap.
EVERY (without exception) presidential scandal of the last half century has warranted a grand jury investigation. It doesn’t take much intelligence to know that grand juries providing evidence for indictments are the best way to really impact a presidency and especially to impact a president.
Civil lawsuits can stay hung up on appeal for years, if not decades.
And besides, there are no issues of standing to get in the way of a criminal investigation by any prosecutor with the courage to launch such a probe.
You've been posting on these threads since 2008. So when did you take on this viewpoint future zot? I've got an idea when you did so to give yourself a thin veneer of cover.
I have no idea what the future will bring. I make no claim to being psychic. If evidence leads to criminal charges, a grand jury or a congressional committee investigation will be convened.
Yes OBot, we know you're just a twit spouting nonsense. There is plenty of evidence against Obama to start an investigation.
It doesn’t take much intelligence to know that grand juries providing evidence for indictments are the best way to really impact a presidency and especially to impact a president.
Who runs grand juries these days? That would be government prosecutors. Some one once said, "If it is not a runaway Grand Jury it's not a real Grand Jury."
Moreover OBot troll,
From the Creighton Law Review:
"A 'runaway' grand jury, loosely defined as a grand jury which resists the accusatory choices of a government prosecutor, has been virtually eliminated by modern criminal procedure. Today's "runaway" grand jury is in fact the common law grand jury of the past. Prior to the emergence of governmental prosecution as the standard model of American criminal justice, all grand juries were in fact "runaways," according to the definition of modern times; they operated as completely independent, self-directing bodies of inquisitors, with power to pursue unlawful conduct to its very source, including the government itself."
Without independence from the cowardly meek and corrupt government prosecutors, grand juries won't go anywhere despite the evidence against Obama.
there are no issues of standing to get in the way of a criminal investigation by any prosecutor with the courage to launch such a probe.
Nice that you recognize this fact OBot, and just as I said, they don't have the intestinal fortitude, and therefore, you take this BS position to fool people that 'you care'.