Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Notary Sojac
Should she have quoted Lev 20:13 as the proposed governmental solution to ‘the homosexuality problem’?

What response would have satisfied?

That neither they nor CPAC have freedom of association? That CPAC shouldn’t host them? That they shouldn't exist? That they are not or cannot be conservative, and cannot vote Republican? That they are an existential threat to our Republic?

What?

26 posted on 02/10/2011 6:49:01 AM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: allmendream; Notary Sojac
What response would have satisfied?

I think Palin's actually got this one right.... finally. She tried to bafflegab it the other day, and all it did was make her look bad.

I think NS was more poking fun at her FR amen chorus... many of whom made Large Statements the other day.

37 posted on 02/10/2011 6:57:26 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson