The politicians with their blinders on, cheer and merrily chug the party train along... right off the cliff.
This is the nub of the war that the proponents of socialism are waging against the United States. They know full well that the greatest defense the U.S. has against socialism is the states themselves (i.e. if social programs are shoved down to the state level, their systemic failures will kill the employing states and its citizens will simply move to another state thereby requiring the state that had adopted socialism--like California--to abandon this silly, impractical idea.
Socialists like Soros and Obama know full well that socialism can only hide its deficiencies at the Federal level because (they wrongly believe) citizens cannot run when socialism fails.
Obama is too stupid to realize that citizens (individual and corporate) will run...to other countries. Soros know they will run, but he doesn't care because his goal was never socialism itself...he makes his living by destroying economies and then profiting by selling short the currencies on which they are based.
"SNIP"
Plus, the municipal-bond investors who'd be getting burned aren't generally hedge-fund traders and other speculators, but individual investors and taxpayers who buy the bonds of the cities and states they live in to take advantage of the bonds' tax-free status. In other words, by upending the municipal-bond market, you're hurting real people.
Just like the "real people" that got hurt in the government sponsored melt down, the government "remedy" and the government take-over of the auto industry. IMO, the author's closing statement is the most telling and accurate..."Obviously, the politicians on both sides don't seem to care."
If these profligate states are not bailed out it will be a short term mess. If they are it will be never ending...until the US is totally bankrupt.
I am a bit annoyed that Mr. Gasparino didn’t offer his own preferred solution. I obviously tend to agree with the “let them go bankrupt” option. But if that is unacceptable—and the Liberal alternative is unacceptable, then what is acceptable? What does Gasparino propose to do?
In effect, this is a real crisis.