Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BigSkyFreeper
She retweeted Tammy Bruce's support of the repeal.

Um, no she didn't. She "retweeted" a comment to the effect of "there are a lot of hypocrites out there" that in and of itself, had nothing to do with DADT.*

In "PDS world", this is en endorsement of a DADT. Just like a statement saying something to the effect of "we shouldn't be afraid to listen to (and debate against) views that we don't agree with" is "defending/endorsing GOProud".

To normal people who don't try to shoehorn everything into a preconceived narrative, neither means what some are claiming they mean.


*By the way, since when has it been the "conservative" position to defend DADT? That was a Clinton-era enabling of homosexuality in the military -- and the pro-homo lobby celebrating its repeal I think are engaging in a pyrrhic victory, since when the current lot of socialists are drummed out next year, a new administration will set new "guidelines" for how to handle the situation, and it won't necessarily be to their benefit.
80 posted on 02/07/2011 8:15:21 AM PST by kevkrom (De-fund Obamacare in 2011, repeal in 2013!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: kevkrom

I was think that a minute ago. People are so hysterical here defending the once-hated DADT that Clinton proposed.

Some people need to get a grip, or at least a faint hold on reality.


82 posted on 02/07/2011 8:18:24 AM PST by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson