Let's assume this true, (I am not privy to the level of infestation at CPAC by homo activists and RINOs), how does a speaker, let's say Michele Bachmann, lend any credibility to those infesting?
The fact is, Bachmann, Cain, et al are not falling over themselves to accommodate your, and others, views. So you throw a collective hissy fit and call them names, like "RINO".
What's next, taking a piece of chalk and printing mean things about them on the sidewalk?
Some people try to turn the tide by staying with an organization feeling that they can influence it for the better. Others feel that actions speak louder than words and walk away from what they see as a polluted pit. Which action is correct depends on the level of pollution. There have been quite a few articles that are very unflattering about the head of CPAC. I’m for walking away but that doesn’t mean that others opinions on staying aren’t valid.