I'm looking for the truth. If Palin sells out God by even recognizing homosexuality as a legitimate behavior, then the truth (God's Word) will be denied.
Palin is little-L libertarian, as were the Founders,
There is no "little l" when it comes to Libertarianism. I've done enough research on it to know better.
You're a fool if you think that the Founding Fathers, men who were PREDOMINATELY strong Christians and legislated our countries laws on the Word of God, were modern day Libertarians.
Queers shouldn't have special rights, and buggery is an affront against nature and against God, but do I want the Gestappo federal, state, and local police going house to house searching for faggotry? No I do not. I want every individual accorded the same 4th Amendment rights I have, regardless of their own sins and vices.
Evil has no boundaries. Faggots weren't content in staying within the boundaries of their own sodomy chambers, and never will be. Up until 40 years ago, when the fags INTIMIDATED the APA into removing homosexuality from it's list of mental disorders, faggotry was seen as just that. Our laws have always seen it as an abominable behavior, in fact those "Libertarian" Founding Fathers looked at the behavior with great concern:
Link to FF on buggery
Palin is a Christian,
It's not possible to play the Libertarian "rights" card and follow the laws of God. Only time will tell which side Sarah Palin takes.
Come on. Do you really believe Palin "recogniz[es] homosexuality as a legitimate behavior?" That is a stretch from the interview. It's unfair, and you know it.
There is no "little l" when it comes to Libertarianism. I've done enough research on it to know better. You're a fool if you think that the Founding Fathers, men who were PREDOMINATELY strong Christians and legislated our countries laws on the Word of God, were modern day Libertarians.
Objection. You can't conflate the modern Libertarian party with libertarianism. The two are no more identical than a republic is to the Republican Party. What do you despise so much about the cause of liberty and self-government? That is little-L libertarianism. Nothing more.
Evil has no boundaries.
Yes, it does: good men and the law. And ultimately the sovereignty of God, although we're talking about earthly law here.
Faggots weren't content in staying within the boundaries of their own sodomy chambers, and never will be.
I was talking about the difference between civil law and military, but OK, let's talk about civil sodomy law.
Up until 40 years ago, when the fags INTIMIDATED the APA into removing homosexuality from it's list of mental disorders, faggotry was seen as just that. Our laws have always seen it as an abominable behavior, in fact those "Libertarian" Founding Fathers looked at the behavior with great concern
Thanks for the link; other than reading about GW punishing the behavior in the military, I haven't read about the Founders' view on homosexuality as it relates to law. I would defer to them, as I do on all things political.
It's not possible to play the Libertarian "rights" card and follow the laws of God. Only time will tell which side Sarah Palin takes.
There's that big "L" again. And what is the "Libertarian rights card?" Do you mean my position that the State has no authority to drag people from their homes because they commit sexual sins? I don't think the Founders believed any different; otherwise, why the 4th Amendment?
We can agree that homosexuality is against the laws of both man and God without according the state authority to drag men from their homes.