It’s obvious that she understands very little about real Conservative thinking.
Why else would she prop up McCain and endorse him as a “real Conservative and Tea Party Patriot” at one of her Arizona rallies? (Which by the way, was instrumental in getting the old traitor reelected.)
In other words, her words say one thing, but her deeds and actions say the opposite. Even after she did all these direct violations, disregarding most thinking Conservatives, she somehow, gets a free pass on what she says and does. Is there some disconnection for some here on this forum, who can’t see or think for themselves?
She never said he was a Tea Party Patriot. Quote the article.
She campaigned for McCain to return the favor of him selecting her. It's as simple as that. Well, and she honors his war service. That's it. I heard from her own lips (I WAS THERE!) that she disagreed with McCain on many things, including energy.
disregarding most thinking Conservatives, she somehow, gets a free pass on what she says and does. Is there some disconnection for some here on this forum, who can’t see or think for themselves?
I am an independent thinker. I do think for myself. That is why Palin appeals to me. I don't knee-jerk react to someone supporting DADT (which we're STILL not sure Palin is) like this whole thread, and think that the gay agenda is on the march. I know the TRUTH, which is that DADT is a vile, subversive policy made up by statists like Clinton, and that George Washington turned sodomites out of the military.