Skip to comments.
Palin defends GOProud participation at CPAC (misleading headline)
Hot Air ^
| 2/7/11
| Morrisey
Posted on 02/07/2011 7:21:00 AM PST by pissant
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 261-263 next last
To: PSYCHO-FREEP
Has anyone yet declared that they are running?
121
posted on
02/07/2011 8:44:23 AM PST
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: trisham
Sarah hasn’t. Neither has Bachmann.
122
posted on
02/07/2011 8:45:48 AM PST
by
BigSkyFreeper
(In 2012: The Rookie and The Wookie get booted from the White House.)
To: pissant
This “article” is a stretch. I fail to see GOPProud mentioned by Sarah and she doesn’t support repeal of DADT. You’re a Retwit.
123
posted on
02/07/2011 8:46:31 AM PST
by
McGruff
(If you are catching alot of flak, you must be on target!)
To: BigSkyFreeper
They have an emotional and mental illness most often caused by molestation. Sometimes by a weak/absent father and an overbearing abusive mother.
124
posted on
02/07/2011 8:46:38 AM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
To: trisham
Has anyone yet declared that they are running? Herman Cain has. I don't if he's filed any official paperwork, but he's definitely said he's running.
125
posted on
02/07/2011 8:46:43 AM PST
by
kevkrom
(De-fund Obamacare in 2011, repeal in 2013!)
To: PSYCHO-FREEP
Unfortunately we can now see it on TV. Chucked mine 3 years ago.
126
posted on
02/07/2011 8:47:21 AM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
To: altura
Sorry, but that “3/5ths of a person” anti-constitution and unhistorical liberal talking point needs to be mercilessly stamped out wherever it raises its ugly lying head!
127
posted on
02/07/2011 8:47:21 AM PST
by
allmendream
(Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
To: Mr. K; BigSkyFreeper
Dude. relax. Save your melodrama for after the candidates actually enter the race and start competing.
128
posted on
02/07/2011 8:48:52 AM PST
by
pissant
((Bachmann 2012 - Freepmail to get on/off PING list))
To: DJ MacWoW
Right, let’s all make excuses for their alternative lifestyle, sugarcoat it some more so it’s morally acceptable to more people.
129
posted on
02/07/2011 8:49:47 AM PST
by
BigSkyFreeper
(In 2012: The Rookie and The Wookie get booted from the White House.)
To: DJ MacWoW
I don’t know if I’ve ever been to a “gay” bar, though it’s been so long since I went to a bar or club I’m not sure I could recall. I may have, and I have been to clubs where there were clearly homosexuals present. At one time we went to a number of parties in the city where the majority present were homosexuals. Fortunately, nothing out of the ordinary occurred.
130
posted on
02/07/2011 8:50:30 AM PST
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: trisham
Most are still trying to get support first. We do have a serious problem, which is a severe lack of Political celebrity among our real and electable candidates.
Instead, most keep going back to the insanity of the past, or blindly support extremely flawed candidates. (Palin)
131
posted on
02/07/2011 8:53:09 AM PST
by
PSYCHO-FREEP
(Patriotic by Proxy! (Cause I'm a nutcase and it's someone Else's' fault!....))
To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
What will be REALLY funny is seeing the Palinstinians weasel their ways around having to accept this. What is even funnier is to see Palin haters like you defend the statist Mitt Romney and his fellow gaggle of gun-banning RINOs.
I won't vote for a damned one of them. I'll vote for Sarah, even if she is for the DADT repeal (SO AM I). I'll vote for Sarah, even if she approves of gay conservatives having a place at CPAC (you mean you oppose them taking part in the political system?).
No weaseling needed, Palin hater.
132
posted on
02/07/2011 8:53:25 AM PST
by
backwoods-engineer
(Any politician who holds that the state accords rights is an oathbreaker and an "enemy... domestic.")
To: PSYCHO-FREEP
This part of the process seems interminable. I’ll be glad when we can finally roll up our sleeves and get on with it.
133
posted on
02/07/2011 8:55:09 AM PST
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: PSYCHO-FREEP
Instead, most keep going back to the insanity of the past, or blindly support extremely flawed candidates. (Palin)Or Romney or Pawlenty or Huckaphony or Governor Goodhair of Texas.
134
posted on
02/07/2011 8:55:14 AM PST
by
BigSkyFreeper
(In 2012: The Rookie and The Wookie get booted from the White House.)
To: BigSkyFreeper
Those aren’t excuses they are reality. Those that have left the lifestyle and gotten help have been very open about what twisted them. There are also statistics on molestation. Mental illness and it’s damage is real.
135
posted on
02/07/2011 8:56:22 AM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
To: pissant
She retweeted Tammy Bruces take on those opposing the DADT repeal. That is all you need to know. Here's something else you need to know: I SUPPORT DADT REPEAL as well! All Constitutional conservatives should! We should return to the way President Washington dealt with homosexuality in the troop barracks: drum 'em outta the service.
136
posted on
02/07/2011 8:57:29 AM PST
by
backwoods-engineer
(Any politician who holds that the state accords rights is an oathbreaker and an "enemy... domestic.")
To: trisham
When homosexuals mix with others at parties they are on their “best” behavior. If you wander into one of their bars without being with one of them they will make your visit hell.
137
posted on
02/07/2011 8:57:57 AM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
To: DesScorp
Not only are they “demanding” it, they want to make it a crime if we don’t...and that is thought control in pure form.
To: pissant
From how I see it, six months in political terms, is nearly an eternity. Much happens in that time. However, a distinct advantage comes from someone getting early name recognition among the ignorant masses. Most seem to vote for names or faces they recognize and have no clue what they stand for. (unfortunately)
139
posted on
02/07/2011 8:58:34 AM PST
by
PSYCHO-FREEP
(Patriotic by Proxy! (Cause I'm a nutcase and it's someone Else's' fault!....))
To: BigSkyFreeper
A PS. If there’s a cause there is also a cure.
140
posted on
02/07/2011 8:59:25 AM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 261-263 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson