Pretending you can be diplomatic and logical with pissant is like saying you should trust Obama to be truthful.
The man is a divisive and despised poster for good reason. He earned it.Nuff said.
No offense, but I have been around long enough to recall when he wasn’t considered a problem child.
If he persists in insisting that his emotionally based argument be given credence, then I have identified the logical fallacy he has used. Perhaps that will be useful for other FReepers.
If he presents a cogent argument that shows Bachmann to be substantially better than Palin, then perhaps my attempts at reason will have found usefulness through another route.
But, he is not the only one who has presented an emotional argument. Let’s argue facts, not emotion.
In the end, I may have wasted my time - but only if nobody benefits from the cold, logical review of the arguments that have been presented.
Have a good evening, FRiend.