When 13 US soldiers at Ft. Hood, including a pregnant woman, were mowed down in cold blood (and 30 more wounded), President Obama didn't interrupt a Native American shout-out to renounce the horror. When Obama finally did speak, he urged us not to jump to conclusions. Since then, next to nothing has been said about the slaughter. The fact that the murderer was a Muslim automatically disqualifies the soldiers from being "good victims."
In contrast, during the recent, also horrific Tucson massacre, 20 people were injured and 6 killed by an apparently psychotic 22 year old. Given that the Ft. Hood murders involved an internal Jihad, doesn't this genocide pose a greater safety risk to this country than a lunatic in Tucson? Consequently, shouldn't Ft. Hood have been dissected and analyzed for months on end?
Obadiah - ping
Few here would argue that there many in the MSM, in the sickest of ways, would use any type of Breslan massacre as a means to obtain political gain. We now have proof - as you cited - that the MSM went completely to the aid of Obama in that circumstance and said nothing and asked nothing. In the case of Tucson, the corrupt MSM went even further and eagerly engaged in accusing their political enemies.
Beware when men call evil good, and good evil, and none can tell the difference between the two. Sadly, in America, we have arrived at that day.