Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rep. Ron Paul calls Egypt a "mess" made by U.S. intervention
The Dallas Morning News ^ | 01/31/2011 | Todd J. Gillman

Posted on 01/31/2011 8:50:00 PM PST by speciallybland

Rep. Ron Paul, R-Lake Jackson, is blaming U.S. policy for the upheaval in Egypt.

"This is a typical example of what happens when we run on intervention-type foreign policies. We get in the middle of these fights. We've been in the middle of this for 30 years now. We've given Mubarak $60 billion. We're responsible for a lot of the mess that is over there," Paul said this afternoon on FOX News Channel's Your World with Neil Cavuto.

Paul, a potential Senate candidate in Texas next year, is a longstanding critic of foreign entanglements, and probably Congress' leading isolationist. His son, Sen. Rand Paul , R-Ky., caused a stir in recent days by advocating for the cutoff of aid to Israel, in the context of a broader push to eliminate all foreign aid. It's a goal he shares with his father.

"I wouldn't just cut off Egyptian aid. I'd cut off all aid to the Middle East and maybe that whole area would be better off for it," the congressman told Fox.

As for concerns that the fundamentalist Muslim Brotherhood, or even Al-Qaeda, would fill the power vacuum if Mubarak is forced out, Paul said the real problem stems from a U.S. habit of propping up authoritarian leaders. Both Mubarak and the deposed Shah of Iran became targets of popular revolt because they were "our puppet government," he said.

(Excerpt) Read more at trailblazersblog.dallasnews.com ...


TOPICS: Egypt; Foreign Affairs; Government; Israel; Russia; US: Texas; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: blameamerica; egypt; israel; neilcavuto; paul; paultards; randpaultruthfile; ronpaul; ronpaultruthfile; shoresoftripoli; texas; unitedstatesmarines
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: montag813

No doubt.

Ron was telling Laura Ingraham that he’s a legitimate candidate now because people are seeing him on FoxNews and hearing him on the radio instead of just hearing what his views are from the MSM. Every time it becomes the slightest bit tempting to think that maybe RuPaul isn’t such a bad guy, he comes out with spew like this and sets us all straight.


21 posted on 01/31/2011 9:49:45 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Liberalism is a social disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: speciallybland

So, do tell, Ronnie—old boy... If we just minded our own bidness, then the world would be a peach of a place, by your measure... And even though the tenets of Islam COMMAND its followers to “convert the world to Allah”—and by the sword, not through persuasion, old boy—things every where on Earth would just be ducky for freedom-loving individuals?

I suppose those nasty Barbary Coast pirates were just a abberation of history? You know the ones of whom I write, don’t you old man? Those “peaceful” Muslim type, who were attacking the shipping of the Old World, the New World, and all points between... stealing ships, stealing cargo, murdering and enslaving crews... and doing this all without the slightest provocation or “interference” by westerners—from the 8th century up to the early 19th—in the name of Allah!

But, then a good-ol Virginia boy—an “interventionist” by your standards, ol chap—a Unites States President, Tommy Jefferson, no less... “bitch slapped” Allah’s pee-pee hard with a big ol stick... Funny how those Islamic types get real friendly once you give ‘em a good Marine ass-whooping, eh, Ron?

Now, do be a good sport, and Bugger off, mate!

Twisted ol dimwit!


22 posted on 01/31/2011 10:05:21 PM PST by TCH (DON'T BE AN "O-HOLE"! ... DEMAND YOUR STATE ENACT ITS SOVEREIGNTY !When a majority of the American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: speciallybland

What a kook!

Apparently, he thinks America would be better off if we just sat on our hands and didn’t have an influence in the world.


23 posted on 01/31/2011 10:07:59 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Noob1999

Could it be, Ron Paul has read the State Department cables on the subject? Check it out — he’s right on every count.


24 posted on 01/31/2011 10:26:19 PM PST by TiaS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

populist nonsense....this for the “head in the sand” crowd.


25 posted on 01/31/2011 11:39:25 PM PST by basalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer; wardaddy

“The picture is a mile wide and ron has a field of view that fits on a postage stamp.”

LOL! That paints a great mind picture!

You are just about as colorful as wardaddy!

I love Southern men...;o)


26 posted on 01/31/2011 11:42:33 PM PST by dixiechick2000 ("First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." - Gandhi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: taxtruth
You sound like a real intellectual caveman.

So do tell TaxTruth, would Ron Paul have told the French we didn't need their help in 1776 as a matter of principle, since he is not big into helping other nations in their time of need or would he have accepted the help?
27 posted on 01/31/2011 11:44:55 PM PST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JaneNC

>> Muslim Brotherhood now has our secrets

Reported more than once on FR but I haven’t noticed any news links. Got one?


28 posted on 01/31/2011 11:49:27 PM PST by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: speciallybland

Surprise, Surprise, Ron Paul blaming all the problems outside of the U.S. on the U.S.

Why doesn’t he just cuddle up with Ralph Nader and decide which one is going to lead on the ticket to help Obama win 4 more?


29 posted on 02/01/2011 12:01:53 AM PST by DakotaRed (Why not just pass a law requiring criminals to obey the laws?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

He does have a point about The Civil War. Buying the slaves would have been preferable to killing 600,000 Americans. Emperor Alexander II of Russia did so in 1861.


30 posted on 02/01/2011 12:43:44 AM PST by Judges Gone Wild (Who are these uncircumcised to oppose the armies of the Living God?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Freddd

Clinton, Bush, and Obama’s answer is to let Christians be slaughtered by Muslims in Kosovo, Iraq, Egypt, and Afghanistan. Freedom of conscience for religious minorities, (unless they are Muslim), in client states has not been a part of U.S. foregn policy since Ronald Reagan. U.S. foreign policy benefits those that pay for it — the Saudis and the Chinese.


31 posted on 02/01/2011 12:51:43 AM PST by Judges Gone Wild (Who are these uncircumcised to oppose the armies of the Living God?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dixiechick2000

Why thank you mam... thank you very much. (my best Elvis) :-)

LLS


32 posted on 02/01/2011 4:27:04 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: speciallybland

Ron Paul
— Great on the Federal Reserve
— An idiot when it comes to foreign policy
—All great nations engage and manipulate abroad. Russia and China do. Even Iran does. Burying your head in the sand type of isolationism is a loser because power abhors a vacuum. China and Russia will move in where we fear to tread. Look at Iran moving into Venezuela and militant Muslims moving into South America.


33 posted on 02/01/2011 4:34:04 AM PST by dennisw (- - - -He who does not economize will have to agonize - - - - - Confucius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: speciallybland
If U. S. "intervention" is what caused the mess, tell the Representative not to worry. The Muslim Brotherhood will straighten out the mess. In addition to the "mess" in Egypt,once the Muslim Brotherhood consolidate their power he also will not have to worry about American shipping using the Suez Canal. He will not have to worry about the price of oil rising.

Now the Coptics, other non muslims, women, young boys, and goats will have a lot to worry about, but, Representative Paul should not even wrinkle his brow.

But in the end,when all is said and done, this is what the majority of voters that voted on November 4, 2008, voted for.

34 posted on 02/01/2011 4:48:09 AM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Judges Gone Wild
He does have a point about The Civil War. Buying the slaves would have been preferable to killing 600,000 Americans. Emperor Alexander II of Russia did so in 1861.

Yes, and wouldn't it be wonderful if Adam hadn't eaten of the Tree of Life?

It would have been nice if they could have accomplished that, they couldn't. It was ingrained into the state of mind of the South.

Furthermore, it's Pauls crackpot attempt to read the mind of Lincoln, without any written evidence, that Lincoln somehow wanted to destroy or change our freedoms by going to war.

Finally, the real clue concerning the instability of Ron Paul as a conservative should be his association with the Anti-War Left and Progressives.

How anyone can hold this man up as some form of constitutional hero with all of the inconsistencies is beyond me.
35 posted on 02/01/2011 7:14:13 AM PST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: pallis
"Islam's fault"

That is the truest statement. That is not condoning wasted foreign aid, but too many people blame it for problems it did not create. Whether we had never given Egypt (or other mideast Islamic countries) a dollar, it'd still be what it is today.

36 posted on 02/01/2011 7:30:25 AM PST by driftless2 (For long-term happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: speciallybland

Egypt would be a mess with or without us. Without us they would already be a Sharia Dictatorship.


37 posted on 02/01/2011 7:35:20 AM PST by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

The net results of The Civil War: (1) The blacks were freed from slavery, something for which they will never forgive the Republicans; (2) The suspension of the 10th Amendment; (3) The elimination of political opposition to the bankers, eventually resulting in the creation of the Federal Reserve and the Federal Income Tax (to pay for those Federal Reserve Notes).


38 posted on 02/01/2011 11:28:56 AM PST by Judges Gone Wild (Who are these uncircumcised to oppose the armies of the Living God?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: sport

Mubarak is tottering because he failed to protect the Copts from the Muslim Brotherhood. He broke The Social Contract. He has lost Yhe Mandate of Heaven. If he repents, he may retain his position.


39 posted on 02/01/2011 11:44:53 AM PST by Judges Gone Wild (Who are these uncircumcised to oppose the armies of the Living God?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Judges Gone Wild

I will not argue with your assessment.


40 posted on 02/01/2011 12:04:49 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson