Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

She referred to the “Individual Responsibility” clause in the Act, not the Constitution. The “IR” clause was struck down. Read 326 again.


342 posted on 01/31/2011 2:38:10 PM PST by rwrcpa1 (Let freedom ring!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies ]


To: rwrcpa1

You misunderstood me. I was saying that the WHITE HOUSE was making the claim that the act was Constitutional under the IR clause. I did not say that it was constitutional because of it.


344 posted on 01/31/2011 2:43:27 PM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (Patriotic by Proxy! (Cause I'm a nutcase and it's someone Else's' fault!....))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson