I think she's one of the fair interviewers. At least she knew all along that the ruling would attack the lack of a sever-ability clause. You know that her husband supports and sometimes works for Sarah Palin, right?
As Greta stated Vinson’s ruling was air tight.
What I want to know is doesn’t the Appellate Court need cause to review the ruling. If no cause can be shown then the ruling should stand on it own.
No I didn’t. Good for her husband. I’m just glad she didn’t discuss this missing element before they passed this monstrosity.