Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: alancarp
Thanks very much for taking the time to read it and present it back to us laymen [laypersons].

Listening to Greta just now, she arrived at your same conclusion --- the judge didn't actually issue an injunction because:

Finally - the injunction: because of the absence of severability and the declaration that the individual mandate is unconstitutional, this is IN EFFECT an injunction ruling.

Thank you again!!!

221 posted on 01/31/2011 1:14:57 PM PST by onyx (If you truly support Sarah Palin and want to be on her busy ping list, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]


To: onyx

Now if/when this get to the SCOTUS I don’t think they will look kindly on O after O smacked them last year. The court is still smarting from that.

From what Greta said Vinson’s opinion is air tight therefore the Hight court may just hit back at O.


240 posted on 01/31/2011 1:21:57 PM PST by Clyde5445 (If you truly support Sarah Palin and want to be on her busy ping list, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies ]

To: onyx
If it isn't an explicit injunction, the fedgov might just ignore it.
241 posted on 01/31/2011 1:22:23 PM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson