To: HereInTheHeartland
There absolutely NO room for “instincts or character” in regards to making tactical decisions. You either have direct experience in Military protocol or you don't.
Not having experience in such things will wind up in a disaster. MaObama is a clear example of what that means.
412 posted on
01/28/2011 11:22:09 AM PST by
PSYCHO-FREEP
(Patriotic by Proxy! (Cause I'm a nutcase and it's someone Else's' fault!....))
To: PSYCHO-FREEP
Well, you may be right. Instincts and character are required for strategic decisions.
When those are poorly made, the need for tactical decisions increases greatly. See Jimmy Carter/Iran.
430 posted on
01/28/2011 11:26:19 AM PST by
t-dude
(Sarah causes banal and vituperous evil snarks to shriek in horror!)
To: PSYCHO-FREEP
“There absolutely NO room for “instincts or character” in regards to making tactical decisions. “
Sarah Palin has as much experience as Ronald Reagan did at the same points of any White House runs.
Very few Presidential candidates have any, as you say, “direct experience in Military protocol” going in.
So I'm a bit baffled by that comment?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson