What makes you think they’d be any better dealing with a situation like this than she would? Neither have them have any military expreience, any foreign policy experience, any national secuirty experience.
Why would you be any more comfortable if Mitch Daniels was on top of this? Is he going to stop the Muslim Brotherhood? Is Haley Barbour going to save Mubarak?
I’m not saying she’s a genius or anything, but I’d be fine with her in the WH. She’d have a good VP. A solid natl security team. If she had people like Bolton, McCain, some good military types, other outside advisors all there, she’d be in as good a position as anyone else.
Bush served two terms as Governor and look at all the stuff he got us into. Clinton served 5 terms. Do you want him back? Dukakis served 3 terms as Governor, would he have been a good President?
Could Freepers who are discussing which Pres contender would handle Egypt the best please start their own thread?