Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: so_real
If Sarah and Michelle both run, just "wow", I'll make popcorn and count my lucky stars.

My gut feeling is both won't run simultaneously. One will likely step aside for the other, for an early consolidation of the Tea Party vote. I could be wrong, but I just don't imagine a scenario in which Sarah and Michele compete for -- and thus split -- conservative votes in the primary.

36 posted on 01/28/2011 5:47:15 AM PST by ScottinVA (The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: ScottinVA

I agree with you. The two of them possess a level of decorum, professionalism, and mutual respect that would prevent them from contesting each other viciously in a primary. One would step aside for the other and probably cover the other's back when the vicious campaigning began. They both make a perfect Tea Party candidate. And to be honest, I think we Tea Party types need to press one or both of them into service and make our support (and defiance) known early in this game lest the RINO's try running another McCain down our throat. Our 2012 slogan needs to be "We Choose or You Lose".


40 posted on 01/28/2011 7:21:11 AM PST by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson