Sure it does. There was no conspiracy to suddenly and hastily produce a certificate of nomination when the text has been consistent since at least 2000. You just won't admit it.
Sure it does. There was no conspiracy to suddenly and hastily produce a certificate of nomination when the text has been consistent since at least 2000. You just won’t admit it.
........................................
Because you say there was no haste there was no conspiracy? That’s your argument? What’s the purpose of the CON Nancy Pelosi signed?
Where did Kevin Cronin come from prior to his involvement as CEO in Hawaii?
From another state, Wisconsin.
Where is he now?
Resigned from his position in Hawaii in 2009.
Is Cronin an Obama plant?
Team Obama would have studied the state’s election laws and ascertained because of a quirk in Hawaii that the ultimate decision of whether a candidate gets placed on the ballot, despite the DPH’s lack of certification, would come down to the decision of one person = the CEO. Therefore it would be advantageous to have someone in place who would be “sympathetic” to the candidate’s position.
I think you have to do better than NO HASTE = NO CONSPIRACY.
This was YEARS in the making. And just like Watergate in a matter of a couple of years a former AG and a President were brought down.