Bias? What bias.......they're just reporting........
1 posted on
01/22/2011 6:05:13 AM PST by
Lakeshark
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
To: Lakeshark
So, the question is...if the WP blacklists Governor Palin from their news stories...will anyone notice?
29 posted on
01/22/2011 6:29:29 AM PST by
Wpin
("I Have Sworn Upon the Altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny...")
To: Lakeshark
Howsabouts a Dana Milbank Free Forever? Perhaps spread the joy and include Gene Robinson. They both can go edit HOA newsletters.
Genuine journalists such as Krauthammer and Will should cease their affiliation with the post.
31 posted on
01/22/2011 6:36:09 AM PST by
Huaynero
To: Lakeshark
The Washington Post is engaging in online political activism by encouraging its readers to boycott news coverage of Sarah Palin.
LOL This is a little like asking crack addicts to boycott crack dealers.
32 posted on
01/22/2011 6:36:26 AM PST by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
To: Lakeshark
All of these liberal state run media outlets would make Joseph Goebles so proud. The Kenyan is smiling all the way to becoming the new world DICTATOR with the help of our liberal run media.
MAKING CONSERVATISIM ILLEGAL IS THE NEW THEME OF 2012.
33 posted on
01/22/2011 6:36:41 AM PST by
Cheerio
(Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
To: Lakeshark
This will probably go off about as well as when all those D-List celebs were trying to raise funds for AIDS research.
34 posted on
01/22/2011 6:37:13 AM PST by
pnh102
(Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
To: Lakeshark
A “Palin Free” month, huh?
This is dangerous hate speech.
What if a left wing nut wants to help make the USA “Palin Free”, if a journalist from a major newspaper thinks “Palin Free” is a good idea than this Palin woman must be dangerous.
As Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton would say, this is a “code word”. Instead of saying Kill Sarah Palin, they say let’s make in “Palin Free”.
I think we start needing to lock up these purveryors of violent rhetoric, I’ll be the judge, this one’s guilty, NEXT!
35 posted on
01/22/2011 6:37:33 AM PST by
word_warrior_bob
(You can now see my amazing doggie and new puppy on my homepage!! Come say hello to Jake & Sonny)
To: Lakeshark
They should run stories about Obammy-Giffords 24/7.
36 posted on
01/22/2011 6:39:19 AM PST by
Dallas59
(President Robert Gibbs 2009-2013)
To: Lakeshark
a NEWSpaper wants to boycott NEWS?
Yeah...
They lost credibility for me long ago but this realoly should do it for the rest of the public.
Sarah should go on a BLITZKRIEG! Oh... sorry...too offensive!
37 posted on
01/22/2011 6:39:35 AM PST by
Castigar
To: Lakeshark
Isn’t this the kind of stuff that used to happen to the prettiest, most popular girl in class, back in High School?
To: FlashBack; athelass; Tina Grazier; acapesket; exit82; backwoods-engineer; APatientMan; ...
Head's up to the latest lib strategy...
Also keep in mind that February is Iron Dog month in Alaska, and so Sarah and Todd will probably be occupied with the race, and so when the libs eventually crow about their success in ignoring her, they'll still be whistling in the wind.
To: Lakeshark
These left wing media organizations go out of their way to cover everything and anything to do with Sarah Palin in an effort to discredit her and derail any chance that she may run for president. Ironically; it has all had the opposite effect. She went from being an obscure governor in Alaska, to a major player on the national stage (not to mention enjoying a hefty increase in her net worth).
They must have finally come to the realization that their non-stop, 2-year campaign of hatred against Sarah Palin has backfired on them so they want to try the opposite approach of ignoring her. Highly unlikely. They are like spoiled, jealous school girls who can't stand the fact that the object of their hatred is impervious to their smears and propaganda. I give them 3 days before someone does a story on Sarah Palin. A negative one, of course, but this is to be expected from the left.
43 posted on
01/22/2011 6:44:58 AM PST by
American Infidel
(Instead of vilifying success, try to emulate it)
To: Lakeshark
Good luck with that. It's telling a starving lion to take lamb off its menu. There is a force of nature at play here that, for once..the social engineers cannot control.
I call Karma!/s
46 posted on
01/22/2011 6:48:42 AM PST by
Earthdweller
(Harvard won the election again...so what's the problem.......? Embrace a ruler today.)
To: Lakeshark
That’s funny. They spent the last 2-1/2 years obsessing over her and now they are going to boycott her.
To: Lakeshark
Does this mean a pause in the highly biased and unprovoked attacks? I think not since the article proclaiming the Palin free month was, itself such an attack.
51 posted on
01/22/2011 7:04:48 AM PST by
JimSEA
To: Lakeshark
The Washington comPost:
A fully pwned subsidiary of Obama Crescent and Star Enterprises.
52 posted on
01/22/2011 7:05:47 AM PST by
Iron Munro
(When a society loses its memory, it descends inevitably into dementia - Mark Steyn)
To: Lakeshark
Wonder if they will ignore the innaugeration?
Pray for America
53 posted on
01/22/2011 7:07:33 AM PST by
bray
(Support Palin to make heads explode on both sides,is that Blood Libel?)
To: Lakeshark
I wonder if these orders came from the top (1600 Pennsylvania Ave). It will be worse than quitting smoking for the MSM to stop trashing this good woman. She should post or say something to test their blackout. :)
55 posted on
01/22/2011 7:10:13 AM PST by
McGruff
(If you repeat lie enough times some morons will believe it.)
To: Lakeshark
I think if the MSM boycotts Sarah Palin, it will indeed be a blessing. THey will have to go after real news instead of just slandering her day after day. Let her have a few days without the hostile glare of the libbie left. They are pouting off in a snit, thinking they run the show. They do not. They do not control Sarah Palin, they do not control her popularity, they do not control how much publicity she gets. They only control how much BAD publicity she gets.
Kiss off, MSM.
57 posted on
01/22/2011 7:18:55 AM PST by
bboop
(Stealth Tutor)
To: Lakeshark
Memo to our readers: ignorance is bliss - and it helps us to control what’s left of your minds...
59 posted on
01/22/2011 7:19:40 AM PST by
trebb
("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
To: Lakeshark
LOL! Poor, poor, WaPoo. Perhaps they should adopt a slogan:
All the opinion that's fit for our bias.
60 posted on
01/22/2011 7:21:06 AM PST by
GVnana
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson