[Billthedrill]

Oh, I used to work with a Harvard magna cum laude who was brilliant and conservative. I'm working with a Yaley PhD now who's a miserbobble Commie puke but otherwise a very nice guy. The former was a librul arts feller, the latter a Geologist (and a damn good one). The problem isn't liberal arts vs scientists or Ivy Leaguers versus human beings, it's the notion that somehow the IL antecedent confers a legitimacy that it does not.

However, "a bunch of us" applies to a very wide demographic and we do have other equally sterling sources for scientists and doctors. A little intellectual humility goes a long way. I'll try to take that advice myself...someday. ;-)

[Eldon Tyrell]

It is not the source of their education that matters - it is the content of their work (or the emptiness of their heads).

There are just as many libtards from Michigan - or dare I list UNC? Or Bezerkely? Or Arizona - Or Colorado, or anywhere. (OK - except Texas and Oklahoma, and some similar schools). in fact - just writing this - the geography obviously jumps out. Wisconson - Libtard state - libtard school. etc. (Almost forgot Duke - remember a certain LAX case? ...)

You should not fall for the “class warfare in sheep’s clothing” that is this reflexive “IL put down”.

The degree only confers the energy you give it - so I’m just warning you off of the easy negative energy. I would bet the data is more geographic than “IL” related.