Doesn’t a bible have to be a King James version to be valid?
18 posted on
01/18/2011 8:25:21 PM PST by
RalphC.
To: RalphC.
Not at all. See Wycliffe and Tyndall, from whom James's translators and editors cribbed a ton of seriously good stuff. And that's just the English version (voir aussi Douay-Rheims).
20 posted on
01/19/2011 2:29:14 AM PST by
Tenniel2
(Crap politicians aren't the problem. Crap voters are the problem. -- FReeper FlyVet)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson